NTSB CAROL · Event
Event LAX07CA251
Registry · N756MN
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
CESSNA R182
Year of manufacture
1979 · 28 years old at event
Engine
LYCOMING 0-540 SERIES (250 hp)
Seats / Engines
4 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19790516
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S AA3173
Registrant of record
MOODY BIBLE INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the instructor's misjudged landing flare.
Factual narrative
On August 15, 2007, at 1115 Pacific daylight time, a Cessna R182, N756MN, landed hard at Coeur D'Alene Air Terminal (COE), Coeur D'Alene, Idaho. Moody Bible Institute of Chicago operated the airplane under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91. The airplane sustained substantial damage. The certified flight instructor (CFI) and two student pilots were not injured. The instructional flight departed Felts Field Airport (SFF), Spokane, Washington, at 1015. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and a VFR flight plan had been filed. In a written report to the National Transportation Safety Board, the flight instructor stated that he was demonstrating a simulated engine failure on takeoff for his students. The takeoff from runway 01 had been normal, and the airplane climbed out with the flaps up and the landing gear down. At 100-150 feet above ground level, he initiated the simulated engine out procedure. He reduced the throttle to idle and pitched the nose down to maintain 70 KIAS per manufacturer recommendations. The flight instructor further stated that he sensed a "high sink rate" during the flare, which made him contemplate a go-around. He elected to continue the demonstration and landing. The airplane landed hard on all three landing gears and bounced back into the air. After the airplane settled back on the main landing gears, he realized "the nose gear was not normal." He pulled the mixture control to idle cutoff and held the nose off the ground as long as possible. When the nose began to settle, the propeller was still rotating and contacted the runway surface. The airplane came to rest upright and the instructor secured it before exiting. The airplane sustained substantial damage, including structural damage to the nose landing gear attach points and the firewall. The instructor reported no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane. The airplane landed hard during a simulated engine failure demonstration on takeoff. The takeoff and climb out were normal. The flight instructor initiated the simulated engine failure about 100-150 feet above the ground. He reduced throttle to idle and pitched the nose down to maintain 70 KIAS per the airplane manufacturer's recommendations. During the landing flare, the instructor sensed a large rate of descent, but decided to continue with the maneuver and landing. The airplane landed hard on all three landing gears, bounced back into the air, and settled back on the runway coming to rest upright. The instructor stated that there was no preimpact mechanical malfunctions with the airplane. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2007_LAX07CA251.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (engine failure, go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Multi-level Adaptation for Automatic Landing with Engine Failure under Turbulent Weather
This paper addresses efficient feasibility evaluation of possible emergency landing sites, online navigation, and path following for automatic landing under engine-out failure subject to turbulent wea…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗