NTSB CAROL · Event
Event LAX95LA311
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the pilot misjudged his planned approach by selecting a touchdown point close to the runway's approach end that did not provide sufficient clearance to safely maneuver when forcast turbulence and downdrafts were encountered. The pilot's early extension of spoilers was a factor in this accident.
Factual narrative
On August 28, 1995, at 1648 hours Pacific daylight time, a Elan/Glaser Dirks DG-300 Elan glider, N300HX, collided with terrain short of the runway while on final approach to Truckee-Tahoe Airport, Truckee, California. The aircraft was destroyed and the private pilot sustained serious injuries. The aircraft was being operated on a personal flight by the owner when the accident occurred. The flight originated in Truckee at 1400 on the day of the accident. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed. A witness reported seeing the glider on downwind for runway 19. He said the glider looked a little low as the pilot began his base to final turn. He stated that he saw the spoilers being retracted and that the pilot appeared to lower the nose of the aircraft in what he believed was an effort to increase airspeed. As the glider neared final, it descended below a bluff at the approach end of the runway. He then saw a cloud of dust rising into the air and ran toward the edge of the bluff. Looking down the slope, he saw the glider near the base. As he approached, he noticed that the aircraft's empennage had separated and there were ground scars on the bluff leading up to the aircraft. As he reached the glider, he found the pilot injured, but conscious, still inside the cockpit. The pilot stated that he had obtained a recorded weather briefing prior to departure in which winds from 010 degrees at 13 mph, gusting to 23 mph, were expected. He said these conditions had existed almost daily for the previous 2 weeks. The pilot reported that he entered the traffic pattern for runway 19 at 7,700 feet msl, 700 feet higher than the established pattern altitude, to avoid the turbulence he expected to encounter. His pattern airspeed on downwind was about 55 knots. Abeam the approach end of runway 19, the pilot partially deployed his spoilers. He made a call on the CTAF frequency announcing a turn to base. While in the turn, the pilot said he did not get the increase in airspeed he had expected. He continued the turn and noted that his altitude was now 6,600 feet msl. He applied control pressure to maintain airspeed and "increase penetration." He maintained that his altitude was more than adequate to execute a safe landing; however, when he neared the runway threshold, the aircraft encountered turbulence and a high sink rate so severe that he lost flying speed, resulting in a crash. The FAA inspector who responded to the accident scene reported that the prevailing winds were causing down stream turbulence at the end of the runway 19. He described the terrain at the runway's approach end as dropping off approximately 175 feet on a 50- to 65-degree downslope. Witnesses reported to him that the aircraft was in a steep descent with the spoiler deployed. As they continued watching, the spoilers were retracted but the aircraft continued to lose altitude rapidly until it had descended below terrain at the end of runway 19. The inspector estimated that the aircraft impacted in nose-high attitude, bounced, and came to rest about 119 feet from the threshold of runway 19, 25 feet from the initial impact point. THE APPROACH END OF THE RUNWAY TERMINATES IN A STEEP BLUFF WITH A 175-FOOT DROP OFF AT A 70-DEGREE ANGLE. THE AIRCRAFT WAS OBSERVED TO BE LOW ON THE BASE-TO-FINAL TURN. THE PILOT STATED THAT HE WAS 700 FEET HIGHER IN THE PATTERN TO COMPENSATE FOR THE TURBULENCE HE EXPECTED. HE EXTENDED THE SPOILERS AND THEN RETRACTED THEM, AND THEN LOWERED THE NOSE IN AN EFFORT TO INCREASE AIRSPEED. ON FINAL, THE AIRCRAFT DESCENDED BELOW THE TERRAIN AT THE APPROACH END OF THE RUNWAY AND CRASHED INTO THE BLUFF. THE PILOT SAID THAT WHILE IN THE TURN THE AIRSPEED DID NOT INCREASE AS EXPECTED AND HE WAS UNABLE TO REACH THE RUNWAY WHEN THE AIRCRAFT ENCOUNTERED A DOWNDRAFT. THE PREVAILING WINDS WERE CAUSING TURBULENCE AND DOWNDRAFTS AT THE END OF THE RUNWAY WAS CONFIRMED BY THE FAA. THE PILOT HAD BEEN BRIEFED ON THE WIND CONDITIONS AND SAID HE HAD EXPERIENCED THEM PREVIOUSLY. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1995_LAX95LA311.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (turbulence). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint
Direct Numerical Simulations of Ice-Ocean Boundary Turbulence
Turbulent heat and freshwater transport at ice-ocean interfaces controls glacier and iceberg melt rates, yet the underlying physics remains poorly constrained.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
Political Turbulence and Aviation Safety: A Cross-National Analysis of Political Stability's Effects on Aviation Accidents
To what extent does political stability affect aviation safety? This research aims to link domestic political conditions and public safety through the consideration of aviation accident frequency.
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Explainable LiDAR 3D Point Cloud Segmentation and Clustering for Detecting Airplane-Generated Wind Turbulence
Wake vortices - strong, coherent air turbulences created by aircraft - pose a significant risk to aviation safety and therefore require accurate and reliable detection methods.
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint
Does small-scale turbulence matter for ice growth in mixed-phase clouds?
Representing the glaciation of mixed-phase clouds in terms of the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen process is a challenge for many weather and climate models, which tend to overestimate this process because…
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Effects of electrostatic interaction on clustering and collision of bidispersed inertial particles in homogeneous and isotropic turbulence
In sandstorms and thunderclouds, turbulence-induced collisions between solid particles and ice crystals lead to inevitable triboelectrification.
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2023 · SKYbrary article
Wake Vortex Turbulence — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary wake vortex turbulence comprehensive article — generation mechanics, dissipation factors, separation standards (ICAO LIGHT/MEDIUM/HEAVY/SUPER + recategorisation RECAT-EU).
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗