MIA94IA183
1994-07-24 · ST. PETERSBURG, Florida, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport PIE
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
COLLAPSE OF THE RIGHT MAIN LANDING GEAR DURING THE LANDING ROLL FOR UNDETERMINED REASONS.
Factual narrative
On July 24, 1994, about 1748 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 402C, N318AB, registered to Tropical Transport Services, Ltd., operated by Air Sunshine, Inc., experienced collapse of the right main landing gear during the landing roll at the St. Petersburg/Clearwater International Airport, St. Petersburg, Florida. The flight was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91 as a positioning flight and the operator is a certificated commuter air carrier operating under 14 CFR Part 135. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed. The airplane sustained minor damage and the airline transport-rated pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured. The flight originated from the Sarasota/Bradenton International Airport, about 1735. The pilot stated that he extended the landing gear selector handle when the flight was on a 8-mile final for a straight in approach and three green lights were illuminated indicating that the gear was down and locked. After a normal touchdown during the landing roll, the right main landing gear collapsed. The airplane veered off the right side of the runway and came to rest on grass. A representative of the operator presented to the NTSB a landing gear actuator which was reportedly from the right main landing gear of the incident airplane. The actuator did not have a data plate nor were any markings observed. The representative first stated that the serial number of the actuator was 3767 but it was determined later by the manufacturer's facility that the suspect actuator was not serial number 3767. An actuator, serial number 3368A had been overhauled on July 30, 1992, and according to the director of maintenance for the operator, was installed on the airplane on August 30, 1992. Review of the aircraft maintenance log entry for this date does not indicate replacement of the right main landing gear actuator. Examination and operational testing of the suspect actuator at a facility of the manufacturer revealed no evidence of failure however several discrepancies were noted. The micro switch was removed for further examination which revealed no evidence of failure or malfunction. The actuator was released to the FAA on October 28, 1994. AFTER TOUCHDOWN DURING THE LANDING ROLL, THE RIGHT MAIN LANDING GEAR COLLAPSED. THE ACTUATOR AND MICROSWITCH WERE TESTED AND NO FAILURE WAS NOTED WITH EITHER COMPONENT. SEVERAL DISCREPANCIES WERE NOTED WITH THE ACTUATOR. THE SERIAL NUMBER OF THE ACTUATOR COULD NOT BE POSITIVELY DETERMINED. THE ACTUATOR WAS BELIEVED TO BE OVERHAULED IN JULY 1992 AND INSTALLED ON THE AIRPLANE 1 MONTH LATER. NO DETERMINATION COULD BE MADE AS TO THE REASON FOR THE COLLAPSE OF THE RIGHT MAIN LANDING GEAR. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1994_MIA94IA183.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.