NYC02LA137
2002-07-04 · Millville, New Jersey, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport MIV
Current FAA registration · N29321
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 177
- Year of manufacture
- 1968 · 34 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING 0-320 SERIES (180 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19680126
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A30357
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's improper bounced landing recovery. A factor was the dark night conditions.
Factual narrative
On July 4, 2002, about 2145 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 177, N29321, was substantially damaged during a bounced landing at Millville Municipal Airport, Millville, New Jersey. The certificated commercial pilot was not injured. Night visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local flight. No flight plan had been filed for the personal flight that was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. The pilot reported that he had departed about an hour earlier and had been flying locally. Upon his return to the airport, he positioned the airplane for a landing on runway 10. The pilot further stated: "...I was high and slow and bounced on the runway and bounced a second time, this time hitting a runway lighting fixture. After the second bounce, I began a go-around procedure, but had sustained damage to the elevator. I continued around the field and landed...." The pilot reported that the left outboard edge of the horizontal stabilator had struck the light. The stabilator had pivoted laterally, and the inboard portion of the right side had a compression buckle. According to an inspector from the New Jersey Department of Transportation, Aeronautics Division, two runway lights on the left side of runway 10, about 1,600 to 1,700 feet from the approach end of the runway, in the vicinity of taxiway CHARLIE, were damaged. Both the 2054, and 2154 weather observations at Millville Airport reported the winds were calm. According to the pilot's logbook, in the preceding 6 months, he had logged two night flights. One flight was on March 1, 2002, with a duration of 2.6 hours, including 1.3 hours at night, with one night landing. The other flight was on June 5, 2002, for a total duration of 1.4 hours, including 1.0 hour at night with 3 night landings. In the NTSB Form 6120.1/2, Recommendation (How Could This Accident Have Been Prevented), the pilot wrote: "More night flying and landings...." The pilot reported that during a night landing the airplane bounced, drifted left, and bounced again. On the second bounce, the horizontal stabilator of the airplane struck runway lights. The pilot added power, aborted the landing, and the airplane became airborne. The pilot returned for a landing without further incident. Prior to the accident flight, the pilot had completed 1 hour of night flight with 3 landing in the preceding 90 days. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2002_NYC02LA137.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…