NYC03LA026
2002-11-27 · Willoughby, Ohio, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport LNN
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to select the alternator to the "ON" position before initiating the flight. A factor in the accident was the tailwind which resulted in the overrun.
Factual narrative
On November 27, 2002, about 1900 eastern standard time, a Cessna TR182, N4929S, was substantially damaged when it landed with the landing gear partially extended at the Willoughby Lost Nation Municipal Airport (LNN), Willoughby, Ohio. The certificated private pilot and all three passengers were not injured. Night visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the personal flight that departed Willoughby about 1830 destined for Cincinnati Municipal Airport-Lunken Filed (LUK), Cincinnati, Ohio. An instrument flight rules flight plan was filed and activated for the flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to the pilot, about 15 minutes after departing Willoughby, air traffic control (ATC) advised him that they were not receiving a transponder signal. The pilot checked, and the transponder was on, but the reply light was not illuminating. The pilot requested clearance back to Willoughby, which was granted. The cockpit lights then started to flash, and the pilot reported an electrical problem to ATC. At some point, the radios began to malfunction, and the airplane lost all electrical power. The pilot attempted to contact ATC via a handheld radio, but was unsuccessful. While maneuvering to land, the pilot selected the landing gear to the down position, and the flaps to 10 degrees. The pilot thought the gear had locked, but with no electrical power to illuminate the safe gear indicators, he was not sure. Prior to touchdown, he selected full flaps. The airplane touched down with the landing gear partially extended, started to slide, and overran the runway before coming to a stop. The pilot secured the cockpit, and everyone egressed. According to a Federal Aviation Administration inspector, tire marks were identified approximately 1,160 feet before the departure end of runway 5, a 5,028-foot long runway. The marks were spaced 3 feet 8 inches apart, and continued all the way to the airplane, which was located about 100 feet past the end of the runway. The main landing gear was partially extended, the nose gear was down and locked, the flaps were full down, and the left horizontal stabilizer spar was substantially damaged. The airplane was moved to a hangar, and placed on jacks. With no electrical power applied to the airplane, the main gear free fell into place, and a maintenance technician pulled them to the locked position. He then turned on the electrical master, the landing gear hydraulic pump activated, and the technician let the pump run for a few minutes to ensure the gear was fully down. Flight control continuity was confirmed to all the flight control surfaces. Both fuel tanks were approximately 3/4 full, and no contamination was identified. The left and right tires were inflated and both had flat spots. The airplane was then removed from the hangar, and an engine run was performed. The engine functioned normally and no abnormalities were identified with any of the engine controls. The electrical master switch was a split rocker type, the left side controlled the alternator, and the right controlled the battery. With the engine operating, the alternator was turned off. It quit charging, and the battery picked up the load. The alternator was then turned back on. It picked up the load, and started charging the battery. During the course of the examination, the inspector identified no preimpact failures with the airplane, engine, or any of the systems. According to the Pilot's Operating Handbook, the alternator switch was required to be in the "ON" position for normal operation. Also, the landing gear was hydraulically actuated, and the hydraulic system was electrically driven. In addition, the flap system was also electrically driven. Shortly after departing, the pilot started to experience an electrical problem, and then a complete loss of electrical power. While maneuvering to land at his departure airport, the pilot selected the landing gear to the "DOWN" position, and ultimately "FULL" flaps. The airplane touched down on runway 05, with the landing gear partially extended approximately 3,700 feet down the 5,028-foot long runway, and overran the end by approximately 100 feet. Examination of the airplane confirmed flight control continuity to all the flight control surfaces, and a landing gear operational check revealed no anomalies. An engine run was then performed. The engine functioned normally and engine control continuity was confirmed. The electrical master switch was a split rocker type, the left side controlled the alternator, and the right controlled the battery. With the engine operating, the alternator was turned off. It quit charging, and the battery picked up the load. The alternator was then turned back on. It picked up the load, and started charging the battery. The alternator was required to be in the "ON" position during normal operations. Winds were reported to be from 270 degrees at 20 knots. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2002_NYC03LA026.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…