NYC07LA197
2007-08-19 · Old Bridge, New Jersey, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 3N6
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's improper fuel management, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation during approach.
Factual narrative
On August 19, 2007, about 1900 eastern daylight time, a Cessna T210N, N6654N, was substantially damaged during a forced landing, following a total loss of engine power while on approach to Old Bridge Airport (3N6), Old Bridge, New Jersey. The certificated airline transport pilot and the passenger were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight that departed Robert J Miller Airpark (MJX), Toms River, New Jersey, about 1845. An instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan was filed for the personal flight conducted under 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. According to the pilot, the airplane flew uneventfully from North Carolina to New Jersey. After reviewing some en route calculations, the pilot thought it prudent to stop for fuel at MJX, before continuing to his final destination at 3N6. After landing at MJX, the pilot had the airplane fueled, and departed for 3N6. About 10 minutes later, during approach to 3N6, the airplane experienced a total loss of engine power, and the pilot performed a forced landing to a racetrack. During the landing, the airplane struck a fence and a cement barrier, before coming to rest upright. As a result of the impact, the left wing spar was damaged, the empennage separated, and the landing gear collapsed. The pilot reported that there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions with the airplane. According to a line service person at MJX, the pilot personally instructed him to put 13.5 gallons of fuel in each wingtip fuel tank only. The pilot did not have any additional fuel added to the main fuel tanks. The line service person estimated that the wingtip fuel tanks were within one inch of full after the fueling. The line service person also provided a fuel receipt for 27.30 total gallons of fuel. Examination of the wreckage by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector revealed that the right wing main fuel tank, and left wing main fuel tank, remained intact and did not contain any fuel. Both the right wingtip fuel tank and left wingtip fuel tank were compromised. The FAA inspector observed that the fuel selector valve displayed "Left," "Right," and "Off" positions, and the selector handle was in the "Off" position. In addition, two switches were located on the instrument panel, one for each wingtip fuel tank transfer pump. Both of those switches were found in the "Off" position. The FAA inspector rotated the propeller by hand, and confirmed crankshaft, camshaft, and valve train continuity. He also obtained thumb compression on all cylinders. The FAA inspector was able to recover some residual fuel in the fuel manifold, and it did not contain any visible contamination. According to the airplane's maintenance records, it received a supplemental type certificate for Flint Aero Auxiliary Fuel Wingtip Tanks on February 27, 1979. The wingtip fuel tanks provided fuel to the main fuel tanks, but not directly to the engine. The reported weather at an airport located approximately 10 miles southeast of the accident site, at 1855, was: wind from 160 degrees at 3 knots; visibility 8 miles; broken ceiling at 2,100 feet; overcast ceiling at 2,700 feet; temperature 17 degrees Celsius (C); dew point 12 degrees C; altimeter 30.11 inches of mercury. During a long cross-country flight, the pilot stopped for fuel before continuing to his final destination. However, the pilot only added fuel to the airplane's wingtip fuel tanks, and did not add any fuel to the main fuel tanks. About 10 minutes later, during approach to the destination airport, the airplane experienced a total loss of engine power, and the pilot performed a forced landing to a racetrack. The pilot reported no preimpact mechanical malfunctions with the airplane. Examination of the wreckage revealed that the main fuel tanks were intact and empty. In addition, the wingtip fuel tanks only provided fuel to the main fuel tanks, and not directly to the engine. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2007_NYC07LA197.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel starvation, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…