NYC97LA054
1997-02-14 · COVINGTON, Kentucky, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport KCVG
Current FAA registration · N922FE
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 208B
- Seats / Engines
- 12 seats · 1 engine
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S ACC61A
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to maintain the airplane on the ILS glide slope, which resulted in a descent below the glide path, and the inadvertent in-flight collision with a utility pole. Contributing factors were sleet/snow, dark night conditions, and the pole.
Factual narrative
On February 14, 1997, about 0620 eastern standard time, a Cessna 208B, N922FE, operated by Baron Aviation Service, for Federal Express, struck a utility pole during an instrument approach to the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Regional Airport, Covington, Kentucky. The airplane was substantially damaged, and the certificated commercial pilot was not injured. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed for the cargo flight which departed from Memphis, Tennessee, about 0400. The flight was operated on an Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) flight plan under 14 CFR Part 135. In the NTSB Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report, the pilot stated: "...Descent into CVG picked up moderate icing along with turbulence, sleet and snow. Was cleared for ILS 27 @ CVG. After intercepting localizer continued ILS until approximately DH where I acquired runway end strobe lights and descended to land. Somewhere during this descent, felt jolt to aircraft but proceeded with normal landing. Upon shutdown noticed damage to aircraft...." In a telephone interview, the pilot reported that he thought the jolt was a bird strike. The visibility was better than 1/2 mile, and the cloud base was greater than 200 feet. He did not experience any problems with the airplane. Examination of the airplane revealed that there was about 192 feet of power line wrapped around the landing gear. The left aileron and wing tip were missing from the airplane. According to the FAA and airport police, a pole was struck 31 inches from the top, at a height of 27 feet above the ground. The pole was located 4,350 feet from the approach end of runway 27, and about 100 feet left of runway center line. The airplane's wing tip and left aileron were found near the pole. A review of airport facilities revealed that the glide slope for runway 27 was set for a slope of 3 degrees. This glide slope would have an elevation of 290 feet above the ground, at a distance of 4,350 feet from the approach end of the runway. A check of the air/ground voice tape revealed that the pilot did not report the event to the control tower, and the accident was not reported to airport authorities until 2 hours after it occurred. The FAA and airport operations did not have any problems reported regarding the ILS approach to runway 27, by flights that preceded or followed the accident flight into the airport. Radar Data from the Covington TRACON revealed that while on the approach, the airplane momentarily stopped descending at 1,900 feet for about 13.8 seconds, and again at 1,500 feet for the same time. The airplane was also observed to level off at 1,000 feet for about 9.2 seconds prior to loss of radar data. Additionally, the descent from 1,500 feet to 1,000 feet took 13.8 seconds, and the last 400 feet occurred in 9.2 seconds. The pilot performed the ILS Runway 27 approach at night in instrument meteorological conditions consisting of sleet and snow. The pilot reported he felt a 'jolt' after he acquired the approach lights, and he continued the approach and landed. Examination of the airplane revealed the left wing tip and aileron were missing from the airplane, and about 192 feet of electrical line was wrapped around the main landing gear. A pole about 4,350 feet prior to the runway, and about 100 feet left of runway center line, had been struck 27 feet above the ground. The missing wing tip and aileron were found near the pole. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1997_NYC97LA054.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, turbulence). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Faculty research project Understanding the Coupled Interactions Between Hair-Like Micromechanoreceptors and Wall Turbulence
This research focuses on understanding the interactions between turbulent flows and long (high aspect ratio), flexible hair-like microstructures or micropillars inspired by those encountered in nature…
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Direct Numerical Simulations of Ice-Ocean Boundary Turbulence
Turbulent heat and freshwater transport at ice-ocean interfaces controls glacier and iceberg melt rates, yet the underlying physics remains poorly constrained.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation Uncovering Resilient Behavior in the Aviation Safety Reporting System Using Large Language Models
Resiliency is present in everyday life, both in system design and exhibited by the operators that function within these systems.