NTSB CAROL · Event
Event NYC98LA051
Registry · N1469N
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
PIPER J3C-65
Year of manufacture
1947 · 50 years old at event
Engine
CONT MOTOR C85 SERIES (85 hp)
Seats / Engines
2 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19700102
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A0BC9A
Registrant of record
COX NATALIE
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the pilot's improper in-flight planning/decision and failure to turn off the carburetor heat during the go-around. Related factors were: the pilot's lack of experience in make and model, and the proximity of trees.
Factual narrative
On December 28, 1997, about 1500 eastern standard time, a Piper J-3C-65, N1469N, was substantially damaged when it struck trees during the initial climb after a touch and go landing at the Ohio University Airport (UNI), Albany, Ohio. The certificated private pilot was not injured, and the certificated commercial pilot passenger received minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed for the local flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. In a written statement, the pilot said he and the passenger departed UNI earlier in the day for a local flight with the passenger in the rear seat acting as the pilot in command (PIC). When they returned to UNI the passenger performed three touch and go landings. The pilot in the front seat then performed one touch and go landing, followed by the rear seat passenger performing a landing to a full stop. The pilot further stated: "After the plane was refueled, sumps drained, and oil checked, [the passenger] got in the front seat and I got in the rear seat as P.I.C. After run-up and mag check, we departed runway 25. Take-off and climb-out was normal. I applied carb heat at mid-field on downwind and reduced power to idle at key position....At touchdown the plane swerved, and I over corrected to the right. I then added full power to go around. As soon as we were airborne, I realized I did not have enough power to climb nor sufficient airspeed to permit maneuvering. The plane continued at approximately 30 degrees to the right of runway center until it hit the top of some small trees at the airport boundary, approximately 250 feet from lift off...." The passenger stated: "...When close to the runway, I noticed some drift to the right which [the pilot] started to correct. Upon touchdown, the plane immediately swerved to the left. [The pilot] began corrections. We swerved back and forth a few times. [The pilot] added a short burst or two of power to try to help settle it down. Nearing the taxiway turn off, he added full power to initiate a go-around....After a second or so I noticed that we were not climbing at a normal rate and speed seemed extremely slow...I knew there were trees out there but thought we were climbing enough to clear them...." Examination of the wreckage by a Federal Aviation Administration Inspector did not disclosed any pre-impact abnormalities with the airframe or engine. It was noted that the carburetor heat control was observed in the "on" position. The pilot reported 227 hours of total flight experience, of which 18 were in make and model. After landing from a previous flight and refueling, the pilot of the accident flight sat in the rear seat as pilot-in-command (PIC); and the other occupant, who had been PIC on the previous flight, was in the front seat as a pilot-rated passenger (PAX). The pilot described the takeoff and climb as normal, and entered the traffic pattern for a touch-and-go landing. He applied carburetor heat at mid-field on downwind. According to the passenger, when the airplane was close to the runway, it started to drift to the right, and it swerved to the left immediately after touchdown. The airplane swerved back and forth a few times before the pilot added power to go around. The passenger stated the airplane did not climb at a normal rate, and the speed seemed extremely slow. The airplane impacted the tops of trees during the climb. Postaccident examination of the airplane did not revealed any abnormalities of the airframe or engine. The carburetor heat control was observed in the 'on' position. The pilot reported 228 hours of total flight experience, of which 18 were in make and model. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1997_NYC98LA051.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗