NYC99LA003
1998-10-02 · TOUGHKENAMON, Pennsylvania, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport N57
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's inadequate preflight inspections which failed to detect an open fuel strainer valve, which resulted in a loss of engine power.
Factual narrative
On October 2, 1998, at 1530 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-38-112, N2535A, was substantially damage during a forced landing after takeoff from New Garden Airport, Toughkenamon, Pennsylvania. The certificated flight instructor (CFI), and student pilot (SP) were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the instructional flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to the CFI, he and the SP started to preflight the airplane about 1300. After completing the preflight, the CFI and SP entered the airplane with the CFI occupying the right seat. After a short discussion, the SP started the engine and taxied for departure. The CFI further stated, at the approach end of Runway 24 they checked both magnetos and noted a drop of 125 rpm. The SP then taxied the airplane onto the runway and executed the takeoff. The airplane accelerated normally, but after rotation and approximately 60 feet above the ground, the CFI felt a loss of power. He immediately took control of the airplane, extended the flaps, and started to "slip" the airplane. While slipping the airplane, the CFI confirmed that the primmer was in, the fuel pump was on, and the fuel selector was set to the right tank. The airplane touched down passed the departure end of the runway in a grassy field headed for a 30 foot drop-off. Unable to stop, the airplane went over the drop-off nose first. The airplane came to rest and the SP egressed per the CFI's instructions. The CFI followed, after closing the throttle, mixture, and shutting off the electrical master. According to the CFI he had approximately 1,700 hours of total flight experience, and 1,100 hours in make and model. In addition, he had about 1,500 hours as a CFI. The CFI added that the engine did not seize, and that the propeller continued to rotate till impacting the base of the drop-off. He added that on a previous flight with a different CFI, the same airplane experienced a loss of power during cruise flight. According to the CFI, maintenance personnel determined that the previous power loss was caused by a leaking fuel line. The engine was examined under the supervision of a Federal Aviation Administration Inspector. When the engine's crankshaft was rotated, compression was obtained on all four cylinders, the accessory gears rotated, and all magneto leads produced spark. According to the aircraft's operator, the fuel strainer was found locked in the open position and separated from the airplane. He added that because the airplane was parked on a slope, right wing low, the strainer would be higher then the right fuel tank. This would prevent fuel from continuing to drain even with the strainer open, providing the fuel selector was set to the right tank. He added that with the strainer open the engine would suck air via the drain. The pilot's operating hand book stated that during preflight to, "Drain and examine fuel from the fuel strainer on the left side of the nose section. The fuel strainer should be drained twice, once with the fuel selector valve on each tank setting." The CFI stated that his student drained the fuel strainer first with the fuel selector on the left tank and then with it on the right tank. The CFI added that they used the right tank for the takeoff. After the airplane was preflighted, the SP started the engine, and taxied the airplane for takeoff. After checking both magnetos, the SP executed the takeoff. The airplane accelerated normally, but after, but approximately 60 feet above the ground, the CFI felt a loss of power. He took control of the airplane, extended the flaps, and started to slip the airplane. While slipping the airplane, the CFI confirmed that the primmer was in, the fuel pump was on, and the fuel selector was on the right tank. The airplane touched down passed the departure end of the runway then went over a 30 foot drop-off nose first. No mechanical failures were detected when the engine was examined. The fuel strainer was found locked in the open position, which would allow the engine fuel pump to suck air. The pilot's operating hand states that during the preflight the pilot should drain the fuel strainer. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_NYC99LA003.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…