NTSB CAROL · Event
Event SEA02FA023
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Improper clearance between an alternator wire and a pneumatic line and fuel fumes. The alternator wire chafe and arcing were factors.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On January 2, 2002, at 1045 mountain standard time, a Beech 58P, N132Z, registered to and operated by U.S. Department of Agriculture, as a 14 CFR Part 91 maintenance test flight, experienced an in-flight fire in the left engine shortly after takeoff from Boise Air Terminal (Gowen Field), Boise, Idaho. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed for the local flight. The aircraft was substantially damaged and neither the airline transport pilot nor the mechanic passenger were injured. The pilot reported that the aircraft had just come out of heavy maintenance and he and the mechanic were taking the aircraft for a test flight. The start, taxi and takeoff were normal. The pilot reported that after the aircraft lifted off and attained an altitude of about 20 feet above ground level, he noticed a fire in the left engine. The pilot immediately reduced power and landed the aircraft on the runway. After landing and coming to a stop on the runway, the pilot shut off the aircraft systems and he and the mechanic evacuated the aircraft with the engine still on fire and smoke coming into the cockpit. Airport fire personnel arrived shortly thereafter and applied a small amount of foam on the engine, which was now only smoking.
DAMAGE TO AIRCRAFT
A Federal Aviation Administration Inspector from the Boise Flight Standards District Office reported that the fire damage was contained to the accessory section aft of the firewall. Inspection by maintenance personnel reported that the fire heat distressed the outboard nacelle web assembly which discolored the primer paint on both sides. The paint had turned black inside the compartment and was brown on the side outside the compartment. Maintenance personnel reported that doublers on both sides of the web assembly were required for reinforcing the structure. It was also noted that the top wing skin under the nacelle was warped. The primer paint was discolored black and the paint was bubbled. An approximate 12 inch by 12 inch patch bonded and riveted to the area was required for the repair.
PERSONNEL INFORMATION
The pilot holds certificates for commercial operations, airline transport pilot and flight instructor. The pilot is rated in single-engine land and sea, and multi-engine aircraft with instrument privileges. At the time, the pilot held a class 1 medical certificate with no waivers or limitations. The pilot reported a total flight time of 6,701 hours in all aircraft and 2,100 hours in the Beech 58P. A total of 180 hours was as pilot-in-command. The pilot successfully accomplished a flight review in a Cessna Citation on October 15, 2001.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
A review of the maintenance records revealed that the left wing fuel cell was removed to repair the "T" plate on November 7, 2001. A new cell was ordered as the old cell was old and stiff. On December 6, 2001, a new cell was installed. On December 12, 2001, the fuel cell was filled with fuel. A slow leak was detected from the inboard end of the front spar and appeared to be running along the lower forward face spar in the channel formed by the lower spar cap angle, and front spar face. Four gallons of fuel were removed from the cell and the leak stopped. From December 13 to December 20, maintenance personnel continued to troubleshoot the problem as the cell continued to leak. On December 21, 2001, the fuel cell was defueled and maintenance personnel found that a lap seam on the upper outboard corner was leaking which was determined to be a manufacturing defect. A new cell was ordered and installed in the aircraft on December 26, 2001. The cell was fueled and no leaks were noted. The aircraft set for 36 hours fully fueled with the access covers removed to observe for leaks. On December 28, 2001, the access hole covers were installed as no leaks were detected. The accident test flight was conducted on January 2, 2002.
TESTS AND RESEARCH
A National Transportation Safety Board Fire and Explosion Specialist inspected the aircraft's fire damaged structure and components. During the inspection, the specialist noted a burned area on the wing skin about 12 inches aft from the leading edge of the wing. The primer paint was discolored and the paint was bubbled. The skin surface was wavy in appearance. The air conditioning system and alternator wire were located in the accessory compartment above this location. The cowling was removed and damage to the nacelle outboard web and other wing support structure was noted in the area of the air-conditioning blower and condensers. A section of the primer paint on the outboard web was discolored on both sides. The air conditioning system was severely fire damaged, sooted and the plastic casing was melted. One of the coolant lines had fractured during the fire. The system contained approximately 13-15 ounces of lubricating oil. The specialist reported that this oil would have been under pressure and would have misted upon release. In the mist form, the oil would have been easily ignited even though its flashpoint is 392 degrees F. The specialist reported that the small amount of oil would have produced a blowtorch effect, which could explain the intense localized damage to the fins of the condenser. The aluminum fins on the condenser was sooted and melted. Towards the trailing edge of the wing, the alternator wire and a pneumatic line was located. The specialist reported, "In the middle of the section of wire, an area of insulation was missing. The surrounding intact insulation was charred and melted. The exposed conductor had areas where the tin coating was missing and the copper wire underneath was visible. There was an eroded pit in the conductor that was visible without magnification. Upon magnification, it was noted that several strands of the conductor had lost material and had a decrease diameter. The pneumatic tube was found in contact with the alternator wire. In the area where the tube had touched the wire, the tube exhibited signs of melting and missing material to the point that the tube had been melted through." The specialist also reported that accumulated fuel vapor from the fuel cell leak was most probable source of fuel. . Shortly after takeoff for an after maintenance test flight, the pilot noted a fire in the left engine. The pilot reduced power and landed the aircraft on the remaining runway without further incident. The engine and systems were shut down prior to the pilot and passenger evacuating the aircraft. Fire personnel responded and applied a small amount of foam on the engine, which was at the time, only smoking. Inspection of the engine revealed that the fire was contained to the accessory section of the engine. Heat distress was found to the outboard nacelle web assembly and the top wing skin under the nacelle was warped. Further inspection found that an electrical arc in the alternator wiring due to chafing against a pneumatic tube was responsible for the ignition of the fire. Accumulated fuel vapor from a fuel cell leak that was an on-going maintenance discrepancy for approximately three weeks preceding the accident, and eventually fixed, was most probable the source of the fuel. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2002_SEA02FA023.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗