SEA93LA172
1993-08-08 · PORTLAND, Oregon, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport PDX
Current FAA registration · N3692X
- Make / Model
- BEECH 76
- Year of manufacture
- 1981 · 12 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING I0360 SER A&C (200 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 2 engines
- Last airworthiness date
- 19810210
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A4306F
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
JAMMING OF THE NOSE LANDING GEAR ASSEMBLY AND THE PILOT-IN-COMMAND NOT MAINTAINING THE PROPER GLIDEPATH DURING THE NOSE GEAR UP LANDING.
Factual narrative
On August 8, 1993, at 2025 hours Pacific daylight time (PDT), a Beech BE-76 Duchess, N3692X, registered to and being flown by Donald Flynn, a commercially certificated pilot, sustained substantial damage while landing with the nose gear retracted at the Portland International Airport, Portland, Oregon. The pilot and his wife were uninjured. Visual meteorological conditions existed at the time. The airplane had been operating on an IFR flight plan originating from Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, Canada, and destined for Victoria, British Columbia. The flight, which was personal in nature, was to have been operated in accordance with the requirements set forth in 14CFR91. The pilot reported that upon arrival at Victoria he was able to extend the main landing gear but the nose landing gear remained retracted. This condition was confirmed by a tower flyby and the illumination of green lights for both main gear and the absence of a green light for the nose gear. The pilot then diverted to Portland. Upon arrival at Portland, the pilot communicated with a Beech trained mechanic and discussed the condition. Additional attempts to lower the nose gear were unsuccessful and the pilot executed a nose gear retracted landing. An FAA inspector who interviewed the pilot following the landing reported that the pilot intentionally chose to land in the grass short of the runway, and that he shut down both engines prior to touchdown. The aircraft was observed to land hard by tower and crash crew personnel in the grass short of the threshold of runway 28R and slightly north of the extended centerline. Testing of the main landing gear system as well as examination of the nose gear wheel well by FAA personnel and a mechanic from Flightcraft revealed that the nose landing gear hydraulic actuator operated properly as did the hydraulic power pack. Inspection of the nose gear wheel well by the Investigator in Charge revealed a black smear on the inside center section of the left nose gear door. The smear was close to the inboard edge of the door, directly beneath the normal resting location of the nose tire with the nose gear in the retracted position. The smear was striated, i.e., longitudinal streaks were observed within the smear, consistent with those which would have been made had the door contacted the nose wheel tire while still rotating. The sequencing of the nose gear doors is adjusted such that the nose wheel does not normally contact the doors. The nose gear doors retract fork was also inspected. The upper and lower fork guide faces were observed to be free of paint as was the inside of the fork groove. The outside edge of the lower guide face displayed paint abrasions, as did the outside edge of the lower portion of the fork. No such paint abrasions were observed on the corresponding upper outside fork edge (refer to DIAGRAM I). Normal operation of the nose gear occurs when hydraulic pressure at the nose gear actuator retracts the actuator cylinder. This pulls the upper drag leg hinge point up and aft in an arc. The lower drag leg, also attached at this point, moves in the same direction. The hinge pin between the two drag legs extends outboard and eventually contacts the fork guide faces. As the pin moves into the fork groove, the fork rotates in an upwards and aft arc, retracting the left and right nose gear doors via mechanical linkages. UPON ARRIVAL AT VICTORIA, BRITISH COLUMBIA, THE PILOT WAS UNABLE TO EXTEND THE NOSE LANDING GEAR. HE DIVERTED TO PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WHERE NOSE GEAR EXTENSION WAS AGAIN UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PILOT EXECUTED A NOSE GEAR UP LANDING AND SHUT DOWN BOTH ENGINES PRIOR TO TOUCHDOWN. THE AIRCRAFT LANDED HARD IN THE GRASS SHORT OF RUNWAY 28R. EXAMINATION OF THE LANDING GEAR SYSTEM REVEALED NO MALFUNCTION WITH EITHER THE NOSE GEAR ACTUATOR OR HYDRAULIC SYSTEM. A TIRE IMPRINT ON THE INSIDE LEFT NOSE GEAR DOOR AND PAINT OBSERVED ABRADED FROM THE BOTTOM EDGE OF THE GEAR DOOR FORK, INDICATED OVERCENTER JAMMING OF THE GEAR WITH THE HINGE PIN SEAT ALONG THE BOTTOM EDGE OF THE FORK. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1993_SEA93LA172.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type. All research papers
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2018 · Accident report Atlas Air Flight 3591 Boeing 767 Loss of Control (preliminary)
Atlas Air 3591 / Boeing 767-300 / Trinity Bay TX (Feb 23 2019) — preliminary. Preliminary investigation findings; superseded by the AAR-21/01 final report.
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2021 · Accident report Crash of Atlas Air Flight 3591, Boeing 767-300 (N1217A)
Atlas Air 3591 crashed into Trinity Bay, Texas, February 23, 2019. Investigation of the in-flight loss-of-control crash of Atlas Air 3591 into Trinity Bay, Texas.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Quantifying the Reality Gap for RL-Based UAV Placement at mmWave and Sub-THz
Reinforcement learning (RL) policies for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) placement in mmWave and sub-terahertz networks are typically trained on simplified analytical channels.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Physics-Aware End-to-End Deep Reinforcement Learning for Quadcopter Control with Actuator Dynamics
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), particularly quadcopters, present unique challenges for autonomous control due to their underactuated dynamics: only four available control inputs must govern six degr…
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Multi-Domain Physics-Based MDO of Multirotor UAVs: A Deterministic Framework for Discrete COTS Sizing
Multirotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) design is governed by a tightly coupled system of non-linear equations spanning structural mechanics, electrochemistry, aerodynamics, and kinematics.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint eVTOL Aircraft Energy Overhead Estimation under Conflict Resolution in High-Density Airspaces
Electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft operating in high-density urban airspace must maintain safe separation through tactical conflict resolution, yet the energy cost of such maneuver…