SEA97IA040
1996-12-20 · SEATTLE, Washington, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport SEA
N941AS has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (CIRRUS DESIGN SR20), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The failure of the left wing walker to verify the clearance between the left wing and the fuel truck during taxi, and his delay in signaling the lead marshaller to alert the pilot to stop the aircraft prior to impact. Factors contributing to the incident include congested ramp facilities, inadequate ramp markings, rain, and dark night conditions.
Factual narrative
On December 20, 1996, about 2045 Pacific standard time, N941AS, a McDonnell Douglas MD-80 airplane, operating as Alaska Airlines Flight 255, collided with a fuel truck while attempting to taxi to the gate in Seattle, Washington, and received minor damage. An instrument flight rules flight plan had been filed and visual meteorological conditions prevailed in Seattle at the time. There were no injuries to the two flight crew members, three cabin attendants, 139 passengers, or any ground personnel. The scheduled air carrier flight, operating under 14 CFR 121, had departed from Los Angeles, California, and was destined for Seattle. An examination of the airplane revealed that the skin of the no. 5 leading edge slat, located near the tip of the left wing, was crushed aft and torn. An examination of the fuel truck revealed a small dent on the upper corner of the aft portion of the tank. According to written statements provided by Alaska Airlines ground personnel, the fuel truck was parked in the safety area of the adjacent gate to refuel another airplane. The aft portion of the truck was protruding into the safety area, designated by faded cross-hatched paint lines. The safety area is supposed to be an area that is to remain clear of any vehicles. A wing walker for the left wing was positioned several feet in front of the left wing tip, with the fuel truck parked in between the wing walker and the left wing of the taxiing airplane. The wing walker stated that he gave the signal to the marshaler to brake upon noticing the left wing tip navigation light "disappear behind the fuel truck." The airplane continued to move forward into the fuel truck as the brakes were applied, and the leading edge of the left wing struck the aft portion of the fuel truck. The wing walker also stated that the airplane taxied into the gate while its nose gear was off the centerline of the painted lead-in "J-line." The Safety Board inspected the J-line paint, as well as the paint markings used for the designated safety area; the markings appeared faded and were more difficult to discern in dark night, rain-soaked, artificially-lighted conditions than in dry, daylight conditions. Further investigation by the Safety Board revealed that the fuel truck had been previously struck by an Alaska Airlines MD-80 at the same gate, designated as "D-1", on January 5, 1996. Gate D-1 is the first in a linear series of gates utilized by Alaska Airlines. Because it is the first gate along the airline's designated corridor, it is surrounded on two sides of the airport terminal building structure, and on a third side by another gate, designated as gate D-2. The fourth, or "open" side is the only open area for an aircraft to enter the gate area. Because of the geometry of gate D-2 and the building structure, the J-lines, safety area lines, jetway, and ground equipment lines for gate D-1 are laid out at obtuse angles. The aircraft was taxiing into a gate area in close proximity to another parked aircraft, a fuel truck, a building, and a jetway. The end of the truck was overhanging into a designated safety zone. The left wing walker who was assisting in guiding the airplane into the ramp was standing in a position which allowed his view of the left wing tip to be obstructed by the fuel truck. The wing walker stated that he gave the emergency stop signal to the lead marshaler when he noticed that the left wing tip light disappeared behind the fuel truck. The lead marshaler immediately gave the stop signal to the pilot, but the airplane continued to roll during the pilot's reaction and braking. The left wing leading edge slat impacted the rear of the fuel truck and slat's skin was dented. Rain and dark night conditions prevailed at the time. The fuel truck had been struck in another incident by the same aircraft type while parked at the same gate. The gate's ramp was congested, and was marked by painted lines that were faded and difficult to discern under artificially-lighted, wet conditions at night. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1996_SEA97IA040.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…