SEA97LA176
1997-07-22 · BANDON, Oregon, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport S05
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to maintain sufficient rotor RPM. A factor was the pilot's limited flight experience in gyroplanes.
Factual narrative
On July 22, 1997, approximately 0847 Pacific daylight time, a Garner RAF 2000 GTX-SE experimental-category homebuilt gyroplane, N6281Y, collided with terrain following a loss of control on climbout from Bandon State Airport, Bandon, Oregon. The gyroplane was substantially damaged and the airline transport pilot, who owned and had built the craft and was the craft's sole occupant, sustained minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions were reported at North Bend, Oregon, approximately 21 nautical miles north of Bandon State Airport, and no flight plan had been filed. The pilot reported that he took off on runway 34, with winds from the north-northeast at 10 to 12 knots (North Bend reported variable winds at 3 knots in its 0850 surface observation.) He stated on his NTSB accident report that during takeoff, the gyroplane pitched nose down. He stated that he then pulled power to idle and held the stick aft, and that the gyroplane then hit on the runway nose low and slightly right of centerline. The kit manufacturer, Rotary Air Force Marketing, Inc. of Kindesley, Saskatchewan, Canada, furnished a copy of a signed statement from the pilot which the pilot had sent to the company via facsimile. In this statement, the pilot indicated that the event occurred at an altitude of 25 to 30 feet above the ground. The pilot also reported in this statement that just before the event occurred, he checked rotor RPM and airspeed, and noted a rotor RPM of 260 RPM and airspeed of 40 knots. The operating limitations section of the RAF 2000 flight manual gives the normal operating range of rotor RPM for single occupant flight as 275 to 310 RPM, and states that rotor RPM less than 270 must be avoided while flying. The normal procedures section of the flight manual states that for a normal takeoff with a single occupant, the aircraft will need 25 to 30 MPH of ground speed to become airborne in no-wind conditions, and the best angle of climb after takeoff with a single occupant is achieved at a climb airspeed of 55 to 65 MPH. An FAA inspector assigned to the accident reported that the aircraft was moved off the accident site before the FAA arrived to perform an on-site examination, and that the FAA's on-site examination was unable to determine whether damage to the craft was the result of pre-accident malfunction, impact damage, or damage incurred in moving the craft after the accident. The inspector did report, however, that the controls of the accident aircraft appeared to operate properly, and that the overall level of workmanship on the craft appeared to have been of high quality. The pilot indicated on his NTSB accident report that no mechanical malfunction or failure was involved in the accident. The pilot held an airline transport pilot certificate with airplane single-engine land and airplane multi-engine land ratings. He did not hold a rotorcraft-gyroplane rating on his pilot certificate, but did possess a gyroplane solo logbook endorsement dated approximately January 20, 1997, about 6 months before the accident. On his NTSB accident report, the pilot reported his total time as 18,000 flight hours, with 50 hours of gyroplane flight time. The pilot reported that after takeoff the gyroplane pitched nose down and crashed onto the runway. He reported to the gyroplane kit manufacturer that the event occurred at an altitude of 25 to 30 feet, and that just before the occurrence he noted rotor RPM at 260 and airspeed at 40 knots. The aircraft flight manual gives normal operating range of rotor RPM as 275 to 310 RPM, and states that rotor RPM less than 270 must be avoided while flying. The pilot indicated on his accident report that no mechanical malfunction or failure was involved. The pilot held an airline transport pilot certificate with airplane single-engine land and airplane multi-engine land ratings; he did not hold a rotorcraft-gyroplane rating but did possess a gyroplane solo logbook endorsement dated about 6 months before the accident. The pilot reported his total flight time as 18,000 hours, with 50 hours of gyroplane flight time. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1997_SEA97LA176.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (loss of control). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Scoping Review of Aviation Loss of Control Inflight Research
Loss of control – inflight (LOC-I) contributes to aircraft accidents at unacceptably high rates. Significant industry efforts and research have aimed to improve LOC-I prevention, detection, and recove…
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2024 · SKYbrary article Loss of Control In-Flight (LOC-I) — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary comprehensive knowledge-base entry on Loss of Control In-Flight — definitions, contributing factors, accident case studies (Air France 447, Colgan 3407), and prevention strategies.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (International Conference on Networking and Services) Risk Assessment of Loss of Control In-Flight Trajectories for Urban Air Mobility Safety
In Urban Air Mobility (UAM), maintaining a minimum separation between aircraft is a safety requirement, which becomes challenging amidst congested air traffic and off-nominal conditions, such as Loss …
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2022 · Accident report Loss of Control on Takeoff in Icing Conditions — Citation 560XL
Cessna Citation 560XL fatal takeoff icing accident, March 2018. Investigation of a Citation 560XL loss-of-control takeoff accident in icing conditions.
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aviation) ANALYSIS OF GENERAL AVIATION FIXED-WING AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS INVOLVING INFLIGHT LOSS OF CONTROL USING A STATE-BASED APPROACH
Inflight loss of control (LOC-I) is a significant cause of General Aviation (GA) fixed-wing aircraft accidents. The United States National Transportation Safety Board’s database provides a rich source…
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Presentation Use of Design of Experiments in Determining Neural Network Architectures for Loss of Control Detection
Abstract—We describe empirical methods for selecting a neural network architecture to implement belief state inference on generic commercial transport aircraft.