SEA99LA053
1999-04-17 · HILLSBORO, Oregon, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport HIO
Current FAA registration · N1310A
- Make / Model
- BEECH 35-C33
- Year of manufacture
- 1967 · 32 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR I0-470 SERIES (260 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19670714
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A08141
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A landing gear collapse for undetermined reasons.
Factual narrative
On April 17, 1999, approximately 1700 Pacific daylight time, a Beech 35-C33, N1310A, experienced a landing gear collapse on the runway while performing a touch-and-go landing on runway 30 at Portland-Hillsboro Airport, Hillsboro, Oregon. The aircraft subsequently slid to a stop on the runway on its belly, sustaining substantial damage. The private pilot-in-command and one passenger, his wife, were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the 14 CFR 91 local personal flight out of Portland-Hillsboro, and no flight plan had been filed. The pilot reported he lowered the gear on downwind at midfield, and rechecked it on base and final. The pilot stated that all gear indicated down. The pilot reported that the approach (performed with 20 degrees of flaps) and touchdown were normal. The pilot stated that the main gear touched down normally but that he had no memory of nose wheel touchdown. He stated: ...The nose dropped below normal for landing roll-out [and] I sensed something was wrong. I applied power to attempt take-off but was too slow of speed [and] rapidly slid to stop in nose down position on centerline of runway. The landing gear appeared to be in a semi- retracted or collapsed position. The pilot stated in a telephone interview with the NTSB investigator-in-charge that the entire accident sequence happened in about 5 seconds, and that he did not remember reaching for or operating any switches (such as gear or flaps) at the time the accident happened. The pilot reported to the NTSB that he had not logged any pilot time in the 90 days preceding the accident. FAA inspectors who examined the airplane after the accident reported to the NTSB that they found abrasion damage to the airplane's main landing gear doors, as well as overstress damage to the nose landing gear consistent with the nose gear being forcibly pushed back up into the nose wheel well. The FAA inspectors also reported that in a post-accident test, a successful manual extension of the main landing gear was accomplished, but that the nose gear did not extend during this test. The aircraft's last annual inspection was on March 10, 1999, approximately 1 month and 15 flight hours before the accident. The airframe total time at the time of the accident was 7,067 hours. According to the aircraft logbooks, maintenance to the landing gear performed in conjunction with the March 10, 1999, annual inspection included: replacement of nose gear door hinge bushings and steel inserts; replacement of nose gear door actuator shaft rods (002-410042-1) along with both right and left hand gussets (002-410000-29 and -27); servicing of shimmy dampener; replacement of left inboard main gear wheel bearing (13889) and cup (13836) and all felts (154-00800); removal and rebuilding of right main landing gear strut, installation of new top snap ring (RRN237C), O-rings (AN6230-B5/M83461-1-227 and MS28775-328), felt (35-815247-9), and scraper (CR 504271); and removal, cleaning, and lubrication of trunnion and torque knee bushings. The March 10, 1999, logbook entry also indicated that rivets, forward wing spar-to-belly skin, nose gear opening and right aileron hinge brackets were replaced at that time. Portland-Hillsboro runway 30 is a 6,600 by 150 foot asphalt-surface runway, and is equipped with a visual approach slope indicator (VASI). Winds at Portland-Hillsboro were reported as variable at 3 knots at 1653. The pilot was performing a touch-and-go landing. He extended the gear and checked gear down during approach, which he reported was normal. The pilot stated main gear touchdown was normal, but he had no memory of nose gear touchdown. He stated that 'the nose dropped below normal for landing roll-out' and he attempted to take off, but was too slow and the aircraft skidded to a stop in a nose-down position on the runway centerline. He stated, 'The landing gear appeared to be in a semi-retracted or collapsed position.' FAA inspectors noted abrasion damage to the main landing gear doors in a post-accident inspection, as well as nose gear overstress damage consistent with its being forcibly pushed back up into the nose wheel well. In a post-accident test, the main landing gear extended manually but the nose landing gear would not extend. The pilot reported he had not logged any pilot time in the 90 days before the accident. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1999_SEA99LA053.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Faculty research project Reconfigurable Guidance and Control Systems for Emerging On-Orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (OSAM) Space Vehicles
Dynamic response to emergent situations is a necessity in the on-orbit servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (OSAM) field, because traditional on-orbit guidance and control (G&C) cannot respond effic…
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR) An Evaluation of an Analytical Simulation of an Airplane with Tailplane Icing by Comparison to Flight Data
This report presents the assessment of an analytical tool developed as part of the NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program. The analytical tool is a specialized simulation program called TAILSM4 which was de…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Publication (TP) NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program: Flight Test Report
This report presents results from research flights that explored the characteristics of an ice-contaminated tailplane using various simulated ice shapes attached to the leading edge of the horizontal …