NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ERA15LA273
Registry · N829T
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
BEECH 35-C33
Year of manufacture
1964 · 51 years old at event
Engine
CONT MOTOR IO 520 SERIES (285 hp)
Seats / Engines
4 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19751001
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S AB53F3
Registrant of record
N829T LLC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to ensure that the landing gear was in the down and locked position before touchdown, which resulted in a landing with the gear in transit.
Factual narrative
On July 19, 2015, about 1030 eastern daylight time, a Beech 35-C33, N829T, was substantially damaged during landing at Wilmington International Airport (ILM), Wilmington, North Carolina. The commercial pilot was not injured. Day visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time, and no flight plan was filed for the personal flight, which departed Pilots Ridge Airport (03NC), Carolina Beach, North Carolina, about 1015. The flight was conducted under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91.According to the pilot, he departed 03NC for ILM with the intent of completing several touch-and-go landings. Shortly after rotation during the takeoff from 03NC, his airspeed indicator was indicating low and sporadic, but he was confident that he had flying speed. The engine sounded strong, and there was not enough runway remaining to "cut power" and land, so he continued the short flight. He contacted ILM air traffic control and requested an expedited landing since the airplane did not "feel right." He reported that he kept the landing gear down and continued to ILM with a low cruise power setting. He was directed to runway 24 and cleared to land. He reported completing his pre-landing check list and, due to no reliable airspeed indication, establishing approach power settings. He lowered the flaps and at 6 to 8 ft above the runway, reduced power to idle to bleed off air speed to a near stall touch down. He reported that, after a short time with the wheels at full runway contact, the landing gear "collapsed." When asked about operating the landing gear selector, the pilot stated that he did not recall moving the selector. A flight instructor who witnessed the airplane during the final approach noted that the landing gear was in the extended position. The pilot held a commercial pilot certificate with a rating for lighter-then-air balloons, and a private pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single-engine land, airplane multiengine land, and instrument airplane. His most recent Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) third-class medical certificate was issued May 19, 2015. The pilot reported that he had accrued approximately 7,600 total hours of flight experience, of which 50 hours were in the accident airplane make and model. The low-wing, retractable landing gear airplane, serial number CD-821, was manufactured in 1964 and powered by a Continental Motors IO 520-series engine, rated to produce 285 horsepower. The airplane's most recent annual inspection was completed on June 1, 2015. At the time of the inspection, the airplane had accrued 3,181.0 total hours of operation. The FAA inspector who responded to the accident location reported the nose landing gear was collapsed, the main landing gear was partially extended, and noted scaring of the runway surface. Examination of the airplane by a mechanic revealed that the main landing gear inner doors were ground down, scrubbing was evident on the sides of the main tires, the nose landing gear was in its well with the actuating rod bent, and the wing roots (inboard ribs and wing structure) were substantially damaged. The mechanic stated that "examination of the landing gear position, and the three push-pull rods connected to the gear box for landing gear retraction and extension, revealed that the landing gear had not collapsed but had been in "transition" when the airplane touched down." The inboard main landing gear doors were open, and the landing gear circuit breaker was tripped. There was no evidence of pre-accident malfunction and the mechanic was able to extend the landing gear manually. Beechcraft Pilot Operating Handbook According to the airplane's pilot operating handbook (POH), Section IV, "Normal Procedures" stated in the before landing checklist, "Landing Gear – DOWN and CHECK." Section VII, "Systems Description" stated "The landing gears are operated through adjustable linkage connected to an actuator assembly mounted beneath the front seats. The actuator assembly is driven by an electric motor. The landing gear may be electrically retracted and extended, and in an emergency may be extended manually." The section further described that "landing gear position indicator lights on the right side of the control console show red when the gear is up, or green when it is down, illuminating only when the actuator assembly reaches either extreme. In addition, a mechanical indicator on the floorboard beneath the control console shows the position of the nose gear. Its pointer is linked by a cable to the actuating mechanism and moves simultaneously with it." The POH also stated that "the landing gear circuit breaker will pop out under overload conditions." The commercial pilot was conducting a short personal flight. According to the pilot, after takeoff, he began receiving faulty airspeed indications and requested an expedited landing from air traffic control because the airplane "did not feel right." The pilot reported that he kept the landing gear fully extended. He also reported completing the before landing checklist and stated that, during the touchdown, the landing gear "collapsed." Postaccident examination of photographs of the airplane found that the main landing gear was partially extended and that the nose landing gear had collapsed. Postaccident examination of the landing gear system revealed that the main landing gear inner doors were in the open position and had been damaged by contact with the runway surface. Scrubbing was found on the sides of the main tires. The nose landing gear was in its wheel well, and the actuating rod was bent, indicating that the nose gear was not fully locked down when it contacted the pavement. The landing gear system circuit breaker was found tripped, which was likely the result of an electrical overload caused by the landing gear extension being physically impeded. There was no evidence of a preimpact malfunction, and a mechanic was able to manually extend the landing gear. Thus, the evidence was consistent with an attempted landing with the landing gear in transit rather than fully extended. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Use of equip/system-Pilot - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-(general)-Incorrect use/operation - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2015_ERA15LA273.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER)
Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗