NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR11LA246
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A loss of engine power during cruise flight for reasons that could not be determined because postaccident examination did not reveal any anomalies that would have precluded normal operation.
Factual narrative
On June 2, 2011, about 2000 mountain standard time, a Scottish Aviation, Series 100 MDL 101, N101MY, experienced a partial loss of engine power during cruise flight about 4 miles east of Chandler, Arizona. The pilot made a forced landing in an open field. During rollout, the airplane's nose gear collapsed upon overrunning a ditch in the soft terrain, and the firewall was bent. The airplane was substantially damaged. Neither the airline transport pilot nor passenger was injured. The airplane was owned by the pilot, and it was operated under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed. No flight plan was filed for the local area personal flight that originated from Chandler about 1915. The pilot reported to the National Transportation Safety Board investigator that the airplane was equipped with two interconnected fuel tanks in each wing. When the engine surged and power was lost, both of the wings' fuel tank gauges registered about 1/4-full. The pilot stated that he attempted to reacquire engine power, but he was not successful. As the airplane's altitude decreased, he redirected his attention to executing the forced landing. The pilot said that the entire flight was performed with the fuel selector on the “BOTH” position. Airplane recovery personnel reported to the Safety Board investigator that no fuel was found in the left wing tanks. About 8 gallons of fuel were found in the right wing tanks. According to the Pilot’s Operating Handbook, the fuel system consists of an inner and outer interconnected tank in each wing supplying fuel through a non-return valve to a fuel selector, a filter and a booster pump grouped together beneath the floor in front of the left hand front seat and thence through the engine-driven pump to the injector unit. The fuel selector is marked FUEL. OFF-L (ie, Left tank) - BOTH - R (ie, Right tank). Unusable fuel on either wing is 0.5 gallons. On June 15, the airplane was examined by Federal Aviation Administration inspectors, who reported that no fuel system discrepancies were found. The engine was test run in the airframe and it started and ran normally. The pilot reported that the engine surged and sustained a partial loss of engine power during a local night flight. He attempted to restore engine power, but was unsuccessful and made a forced landing to an open field where the airplane impacted a ditch, collapsing the landing gear and bending the firewall during the landing roll. The pilot said that the entire flight was performed with the fuel selector on the “BOTH” position and that when the engine first began to surge, the fuel gauges registered a quarter of capacity in each tank. The fuel system consisted of inner and outer interconnected tanks in each wing, which supplied fuel through a non-return valve to a fuel selector, a filter, and a booster pump grouped together near the front left seat, then through the engine-driven pump to the injector unit. Unusable fuel in each wing is 0.5 gallons. Airplane recovery personnel said that no fuel was found in the left wing tanks and about 8 gallons of fuel were found in the right wing tanks, although the gear collapse may have allowed fuel to migrate from the high wing to the low wing. The airplane was examined and no fuel system discrepancies were found. The engine was test run in the airframe and it started and ran normally. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2011_WPR11LA246.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.