NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR12LA057
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The flight's encounter with known severe turbulence associated with mountain wave activity, which resulted in a flight attendant sustaining a broken ankle.
Factual narrative
On December 1, 2011, about 1339 Pacific standard time, a Boeing 757-222, N547UA, encountered turbulence at flight level (FL) 300, during the cruise phase of flight. United Airlines (UAL) operated flight 721 under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121 as a scheduled domestic passenger flight. One flight attendant sustained serious injuries; the 2 flight crew, 3 additional flight attendants, and 146 passengers were not injured. The airplane was not damaged. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan had been filed. The flight departed the Denver International Airport (DEN), Denver, Colorado, at 1215, and was en-route to San Francisco International Airport (SFO), San Francisco, California, when the turbulence was encountered.According to United Airlines, the Western United States was experiencing widespread moderate to severe turbulence on the day of the incident. The flight planned en route cruise altitude was FL360. While en route, the flight descended to FL300 at 13:17 PT because smoother conditions were reported. As the flight was nearing the Sierra Nevada Mountains on the Modesto 3 arrival into San Francisco, there were reports of turbulence up ahead. When the reports were received, the captain illuminated the seat belt sign and made an announcement for passengers to be seated with seat belts fastened. The purser was contacted by the captain to discuss the approaching area of turbulence. The captain directed the purser to have the flight attendants wrap up cabin service, and stay near their seats and to be seated immediately if turbulence was encountered. The purser advised the cabin crew of the captain's directions. After the announcement was made, an aft galley flight attendant stated she went into the lavatory to brush her teeth. After approximately 7-10 minutes later, following the announcement, 2-3 jolts of moderate turbulence followed by a brief episode of severe turbulence was encountered. This occurred 22 minutes before landing. The flight, at the time, was on the Modesto Three Standard Terminal Arrival for SFO, in the vicinity of ELCAP intersection. The flight attendant, in the lavatory, reportedly was thrown twice in the air, and landed awkwardly on her right ankle. The flight continued to San Francisco and landed at 1401 local time. The turbulence event was reported by United Airlines on December 5, 2011, after it was confirmed that one of the flight attendants had suffered a broken fibula. A weather study was completed by a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) staff meteorologist; the complete study is attached to the public docket for this report. The area was favorable for mountain wave activity over the region due to an upper level low, and strong wind flow over the mountain ranges. The GOES-11 visible and infrared satellite images depicted clear skies over the accident area with no visual signs of potential turbulence. Several pilot reports in the surrounding area and at varying altitudes around the time of the accident reported low-level wind shear, extreme turbulence, occasional to moderate chop, continuous light chop, and moderate to severe turbulence, along with mountain wave activity. The flight data recorder (FDR) information was read out and analyzed by a flight data recorder specialist at the NTSB. The complete report is attached to the public docket for this accident. The FDR contained approximately 108 hours of recorded data, which included the turbulence event. The FDR data indicated that approximately 1 hour 34 minutes after takeoff, the vertical acceleration fluctuated between 0 g's and 2 g's peaking at a maximum of 1.91 g's during a 28-second time period. According to an excerpt from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Air Traffic Control (ATC) package, at 1242, UAL flight 721 checked into sector 34, and was told to expect occasional light chop. The flight crew was also told that AIRMETs for the western United States were available on HIWAS, flight watch, or flight service frequencies. The flight crew was then issued a frequency change. Upon check in with the new sector (sector 47), the flight crew was advised that their ride would deteriorate in about 20 minutes. The UAL flight crew was instructed to advise when that happened. The sector controller told them to plan on a lower altitude. About 15 minutes later, the UAL flight crew requested a lower altitude. UAL flight 721 was issued another frequency change. After checking in with the new sector controller the flight crew was advised of "bad rides over the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range, but that FL300 and FL320 were not bad." When queried how their ride was, the flight crew responded that they had experienced light chop. About 10 minutes later, the flight crew reported that they had encountered moderate to severe at FL 300 and asked for a lower altitude. UAL flight 721 was cleared to FL270, and the sector controller asked them to verify that they had encountered severe turbulence, to which the pilot replied that he wouldn't quite call it severe turbulence, but it was a bad ride. The detailed report is attached to the public docket for this report. The flight continued to its destination and landed without further incident. While en route at flight level (FL) 360, the captain of the commercial air carrier flight requested and was granted a lower altitude (FL 300) to minimize the effect that turbulence was having on the airplane. After the captain received pilot reports indicating that varying degrees of turbulence, mountain wave activity, and low-level windshear existed, he illuminated the seat belt sign and made an announcement for the passengers to be seated. The flight crew then advised the cabin crewmembers of possible turbulence and instructed them to prepare the cabin for landing, stay near their seats, and be seated immediately if turbulence was encountered. About 7 to 10 minutes later, while the airplane was at FL 300, the flight encountered moderate-to-severe turbulence. A flight attendant who was in the lavatory when the turbulence was encountered sustained a broken ankle after being thrown in the air twice. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Turbulence-Terrain induced turbulence-Effect on equipment - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2011_WPR12LA057.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (wind shear, turbulence). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR)
An Examination of Aviation Accidents Associated with Turbulence, Wind Shear and Thunderstorm
The focal point of the study reported here was the definition and examination of turbulence, wind shear and thunderstorm in relation to aviation accidents.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Preprint (Draft being sent to journal)
Convectively Induced Turbulence Encountered During NASA's Fall-2000 Flight Experiments
Aircraft encounters with atmospheric turbulence are a leading cause of in-flight injuries aboard commercial airliners and cost the airlines millions of dollars each year.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Memorandum (TM)
Some aspects of wind shear in the upper atmosphere
Hydrodynamic turbulence and wind shear in upper atmosphere
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2019 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Low Level Turbulence Detection For Airports
Abstract—— Low level wind shear and turbulence present a serious safety risk to aircraft during the approach, landing and take-off phases.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2018 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Evaluating the Effect of Turbulence on Aircraft During Landing and Take-Off Phases
—— Low level wind shear and turbulence present a serious safety risk to aircraft during the approach, landing and take-off phases.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint
Direct Numerical Simulations of Ice-Ocean Boundary Turbulence
Turbulent heat and freshwater transport at ice-ocean interfaces controls glacier and iceberg melt rates, yet the underlying physics remains poorly constrained.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗