WPR13CA219

Factual narrative

The student pilot reported that he was flying the airplane from Oklahoma to California in pursuit of employment opportunities. During that trip, he was attempting a night landing for a fuel stop at an unattended airport, and was unable to activate the runway lights via radio. He made one approach to runway 32, executed a missed approach, and then initiated an approach to the opposite end, runway 14. He conducted that approach based on "two lights that he thought were the runway" lights. When the airplane was very close to the ground, the pilot realized that the lights were security lights on a building, and initiated a go-around. However, the airplane struck an airport boundary fence to the northeast of the runway, and came to rest on a street outside airport property. The wings and fuselage were substantially damaged by the impact with the fence. Postaccident examination revealed that the number one communications radio in the airplane was set to the proper frequency to activate the runway lights, but that the radio selector switch was set to the number two communications radio, which was set to a different frequency. When power was applied to the airplane and the radio selector switch was set to the number one radio, the runway lights were successfully activated. The pilot reported no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. During a cross-country flight, the student pilot was attempting a night landing for a fuel stop at an unattended airport and was unable to activate the runway lights via radio. He made one approach to runway 32, executed a missed approach, and then initiated an approach to runway 14. He conducted that approach based on two lights that he thought were the runway lights. When the airplane was very close to the ground, the pilot realized that the lights were security lights on a building and initiated a go-around. However, the airplane struck an airport boundary fence northeast of the runway and came to rest on a street outside airport property. The wings and fuselage were substantially damaged by the impact with the fence. Postaccident examination revealed that the No. 1 communications radio in the airplane was set to the proper frequency to activate the runway lights but that the radio selector switch was set to the No. 2 communications radio, which was set to a different frequency. When power was applied to the airplane and the radio selector switch was set to the No. 1 radio, the runway lights were successfully activated. The pilot reported no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12

NTSB Findings

FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.

• C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Descent/approach/glide path-Not attained/maintained - C
• C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Student pilot - C
• F Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Use of equip/system-Student pilot - F
• F Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Identification/recognition-Student pilot - F
• — Environmental issues-Physical environment-Object/animal/substance-Fence/fence post-Not specified