NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR13LA009
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Total loss of engine power during the landing approach due to insect debris in the carburetor metering valve, which resulted in fuel starvation.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On October 13, 2012, about 1215 Pacific daylight time, a Piper PA-38-112, N4309E, collided with terrain following a loss of engine power during landing at Corona Municipal Airport, Corona, California. The pilot/owner was operating the airplane under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The commercial pilot sustained minor injuries. The airplane was substantially damaged during the accident sequence. The local flight departed Corona about 1115. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed. The pilot reported that during the landing approach he performed his pre-landing checks, and that shortly after turning on the auxiliary fuel pump, the engine lost all power. He performed troubleshooting procedures, with no increase in engine power. The airplane was on the left downwind leg of runway 07, and the pilot was concerned that he did not have enough altitude to turn towards the runway; he elected to land the airplane in a field directly ahead. During the approach, the right wing struck a tree, and the airplane descended underneath a power line, striking the airport perimeter fence and coming to rest in a field. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the right wing, firewall, and tailcone during the accident sequence.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
The low-wing, single-engine airplane, was manufactured in 1978, and equipped with a Lycoming O-235-L2C engine, serial number L-16453-15. Maintenance records indicated that the engine was overhauled and installed on the airplane in 2004. At the time of the most recent annual inspection, dated March 3, 2010, the engine had accrued a total flight time of 115 hours since overhaul. At that time, the airframe had accrued 2,021 flight hours. The engine tachometer indicated 2,075.06 hours at the accident site. The pilot reported that he kept the airplane stored at an outdoor tie-down spot at Corona Airport.
TESTS AND RESEARCH
Fuel Supply System Aircraft recovery personnel reported draining about 2 gallons of fuel from the left tank during the recovery operation. The right tank was breached, and a 6-foot-long by 2-foot-wide stain was present on the ground surrounding the tank. During the subsequent airframe examination by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator, an additional 2 gallons of fuel was observed in the left tank. The fuel lines from the tanks to the carburetor inlet were full with fuel and free of obstruction. The gascolator bowl was full of light-colored fluid consistent in color and odor with aviation gasoline, and its filter screen was free of debris. The fuel selector valve was observed in the right tank position. The valve could be moved through its detents by hand, but crumpled airframe structure had become impinged against the selector shaft, preventing smooth operation of the handle. The electrically driven fuel pump issued fuel when engaged. Examination of the wing tank vent ports, located underneath each wing, revealed that they were completely plugged by a mud-like substance. The ports were removed, and the obstruction appeared consistent with Mud Dauber (wasp) debris. The fuel tank filler caps were of the vented type. Examination revealed that the vent flapper valve was intact, and that the vent opened appropriately with the application of low air vacuum. Carburetor The Precision Airmotive Carburetor, model MA-3A, remained undamaged, and firmly attached to the intake manifold. The fuel mixture, throttle, and carburetor heat linkages were intact and continuous to their respective cabin controls, and moved smoothly when operated. The airbox and filter assembly sustained crush damage. Although the forward surface of the filter element was coated in a wax-like substance, the filter was able to pass air when blown. The fuel inlet screen was free of debris. The carburetor was removed and opened for examination. The bowl was about half full with clear, blue-colored fuel. The float was of the brass type, and appeared intact and free of leaks. The float valve was intact, pliable, and along with the valve seat, free of contamination. A wasp-like insect was at the bottom of the bowl, adjacent to the bowl drain plug and mixture metering sleeve. Further examination of the metering valve revealed the head of a wasp-like insect wedged within the valves inner sleeve. The position of the head was adjacent to the fuel channel hole in the carburetor body. The design of the carburetor bowl allows for two direct paths to atmospheric pressure. The first is the drain plug, which, when removed, allows fuel to be drained through two, 3/32-inch-wide drain channels. The second path is that of the atmospheric bowl vent. The opening for this vent is 1/4-inch-wide, and located at the carburetor air inlet, adjacent to the throttle flange, and upstream of the fuel nozzle outlet. The vent channel continues through the carburetor body, and into the roof of the fuel bowl, where it reduces in size to a 3/16-inch orifice. Carburetor induction air enters a chin scoop intake in the lower airbox cowling, and flows directly through the filter, and into the carburetor airbox. The airbox incorporates a positive shut off (door) heat intake, so that when carburetor heat was selected, unfiltered induction air was drawn through a hose attached to a muffler shroud. Engine The engine sustained minimal damage during the accident sequence, and post impact examination did not reveal any anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. After flying for about 1 hour, the pilot prepared the airplane for the landing approach. As he entered the downwind leg of the approach, the engine lost all power. Unable to restart the engine, the pilot performed a forced landing into an adjacent field, where the airplane sustained substantial damage. A wasp was found in the carburetor fuel bowl, and a wasp head was located wedged within the inner sleeve of the carburetor metering valve. The head was adjacent to the fuel channel hole, blockage of which would have resulted in a loss of fuel flow to the engine and subsequent loss of engine power. Both fuel tank vent ports were also found completely blocked with mud that was likely deposited by the wasp. However, the blocked fuel tank vent ports were unlikely to cause fuel starvation because fuel was present in all the supply lines and the fuel tanks were equipped with venting fuel caps, which were operational. The only path for a wasp-sized insect to access the carburetor fuel bowl was via the atmospheric bowl vent, the opening of which was located at the carburetor's air inlet. The vent leads directly to the fuel bowl and is wide enough for a wasp to pass through. The wasp most likely accessed the vent through either a hole in the air induction system, a gap in the carburetor-heat door seal, or through the carburetor-heat door opening (assuming the door had not been fully closed on the ground). It is not known when the wasp entered the fuel system. The airplane’s last annual inspection was performed about 2 1/2 years prior to the accident; however, it is unlikely the wasp would have been discovered during an annual inspection because the carburetor is not an inspection item. The insect would also be difficult to detect during preflight inspection. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine fuel and control-Fuel control/carburetor-Damaged/degraded - C
- C Environmental issues-Physical environment-Object/animal/substance-Debris/dirt/foreign object-Effect on equipment - C
- — Aircraft-Aircraft handling/service-Maintenance/inspections-Scheduled maint checks-Not serviced/maintained
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Inspection-Scheduled/routine inspection-Not specified
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2012_WPR13LA009.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel starvation, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗