ANC93LA048
1993-03-25 · MEKORYUK, Alaska, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport MYU
N9102Y has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (YAKOVLEV YAK 52), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
PILOT-IN-COMMAND INITIATED VFR FLIGHT INTO IMC CONDITIONS. A FACTOR IN THIS ACCIDENT WAS THE WHITEOUT WEATHER CONDITIONS.
Factual narrative
On March 25, 1993, at approximately 1140 Alaska standard time, a Piper PA-31 airplane, N9102Y, operated by Missionary Aviation Repair Center, d.b.a. MARC Aviation of Soldotna, Alaska, collided with terrain during a visual approach to Mekoryuk, Nunivak Island, Alaska. The flight departed Hooper Bay, Alaska, at 1105 and was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91 for business purposes on a VFR flight plan. Instrument meteorological conditions existed at the Mekoryuk airport at the time. The airline transport certificated pilot and a passenger received minor injuries and two passengers were unhurt. The airplane was substantially damaged. The accident airplane is owned and operated by the MARC organization reportedly to provide transportation in Alaska to religious groups and missions. The aircraft routinely operate to and from remote villages and airports. The organization does not hold, nor is it required to hold, an air taxi certificate under 14 CFR Part 135. As such, neither a principal operations inspector, nor a principal maintenance inspector, is assigned for surveillance and the organization is not required to submit or maintain a training or operations manual. The pilot reported his departure from Hooper Bay to Bethel F1ight service Station and was given the Mekoryuk AWOS weather observation as marginal visual flight rules and "visual flight rules not recommended." The pilot reportedly radioed that he was "going to give it a look." Nunivak Island residents at the town of Mekoryuk reported that at approximately 11:30, they heard but could not see, an aircraft in the clouds north of the town. In an interview with the NTSB the pilot stated that he was conducting a visual approach with an non-directional beacon and distance measuring equipment (NDB/DME) approach "back up" to runway 5. He stated that upon arriving north of the island, that he could see the ground along the island's north coast before he started the visual approach, but that he got "tripped up in a white out" and hit the hills at 500 foot altitude. Local reindeer herders were alerted to the likelihood of an airplane crash and found two passengers walking near the Mekoryuk airport The rescuers reported that they found the wreckage on the slope of a 406 foot hill, approximately 4 and 1/2 miles west of the airport. The terrain on Nunivak Island is rolling tundra which was snow covered at the time of the accident. The automated weather observation station (AWOS) provided weather observations that indicated variable weather conditions during the accident period including obscurations, scattered and broken clouds, with visibility varying between one mile and 10 miles during a two hour period before and after the accident. The pilot told investigators that the airplane's flight instruments seemed to be operating normal. The records of the airplane's barometric altimeter indicated that the altimeter and pitot static system had been tested as required by 14 CFR Part 91.411, 10 days before the accident and was certified as accurate. The airplane was equipped for instrument flight. There was no copilot on the flight, nor was there one required. In a statement to the NTSB, the pilot said that he had looked at the approach plate (attached) "a few minutes before arriving in the vicinity" and should have been at 1100 feet (msl) vice 500 feet when the aircraft collided with the terrain, that was "my mistake." The airline transport pilot provided information to the NTSB that he had 33,362 hours of total pilot time, 12,500 hours of night time and 3,385 hours of instrument pilot time. During the previous 90, 30 day and 24 hour time period, respectively, he had 56, 13 and approximately 11 hours of flight time, respectively. His airline transport pilot ratings included the DC-3, Convair 240/340, DC-6, DC-7, Boeing 707 and Boeing 747. PILOT-IN-COMMAND EXECUTED VFR STRAIGHT IN APPROACH FOLLOWING THE NDB/DME APPROACH COURSE. WHITEOUT CONDITIONS WERE ENCOUNTERED OVER SNOW COVERED FEATURELESS TERRAIN. VFR FLIGHT NOT RECOMMENDED BY FSS. THE AIRCRAFT FLEW INTO SLOPING TERRAIN APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET BELOW, AND IN THE VICINITY OF, THE FINAL APPROACH FIX. PILOT RECALLED LOSING FORWARD VISIBILITY AND SAID HE WAS NOT REFERENCING THE APPROACH PLATE AT THE TIME OF THE GROUND COLLISION. THE PILOT WAS ADVISED THAT THE AWOS WEATHER OBSERVATION FOR THE DESTINATION CALLED FOR IFR CONDITIONS WITH VFR NOT RECOMMENDED. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1993_ANC93LA048.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (imc, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…