ANC94LA062
1994-05-31 · KOTZEBUE, Alaska, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport OTZ
Current FAA registration · N4320Z
- Make / Model
- PIPER PA-18-150
- Year of manufacture
- 1968 · 26 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING 0-320 SERIES (180 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 2 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19960408
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A52CFC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
DIRECTIONAL CONTROL NOT MAINTAINED BY THE PILOT IN COMMAND. A FACTOR IN THE ACCIDENT WAS THE INADVERTANT GROUND LOOP/SWERVE.
Factual narrative
On May 31, 1994, at approximately 2230 Alaska daylight time, a wheel equipped Piper PA-18 Supercub airplane, N4320Z owned by Michael Spisak, d.b.a. Alaska Island Air, nosed over in a water-filled ditch along side the runway at the Kotzebue Airport, Alaska. The airline transport pilot, occupying the rear seat and an uncertificated dual flight student, occupying the front seat, were not injured in the accident which substantially damaged the airplane. The airplane was being operated under 14 CFR Part 91, without a flight plan, in visual meteorological conditions, for the purpose of performing touch and go landings in the local area. The pilot told investigators that during the landing roll, a crosswind picked up the wing, and he "just let it go a little too far," when the airplane turned right angles to the runway, departed the gravel surface and overturned in the water-filled ditch. He said that he was in the pattern showing a friend touch and go landings. Witnesses reported the airplane to have been doing a series of touch and go landings prior to the accident. Investigators from the NTSB and FAA learned that the pilot had been occupying the rear seat of the Supercub and the person in the front seat was not a certificated pilot. Asked if he was conducting training in touch and go's, the pilot in command told the NTSB investigators, "well not exactly, I'm not a CFR, he (the student in the front seat) just works for Mike Spisak." The pilot was asked by the NTSB to show the aircraft to an FAA inspector who would be arriving the following day. The pilot said "no, he (the inspector) can't come on Mike's (Spisak, Ram Aviation, Kotzebue) property, there's a restraining order." The FAA inspector was able to see the airplane and described the airframe damage to the wing tip bow, several ribs and the forward spar to be substantial. The pilot reportedly discussed the accident and said that a crosswind caused a loss of control, and he denied that he was giving flight instruction to the pilot in the front seat. In a pilot report to the NTSB, the pilot indicated that he was a pilot in command of single and multiengined airplanes and listed all of his pilot time as pilot in command. This time included multiengined airplanes requiring two pilots (he listed a DC-3 type rating), none of which he listed as copilot time. Of his entire 5500 hours claimed as pilot time, no time was listed as dual student or copilot. The pilot in command indicated that he had 100 hours of instructor time in single and multiengine airplanes. FAA records indicate that he does not hold a flight instructor's certificate. The pilot in command also indicated that he had 20 hours total experience in the accident airplane make and model, and all was "pilot in command." DURING A CROSSWIND LANDING, WHILE DOING A SERIES OF TOUCH AND GO LANDINGS WITH A PASSENGER, THE PILOT LOST DIRECTIONAL CONTROL AND THE AIRCRAFT GROUND LOOPED. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1994_ANC94LA062.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (loss of control). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Scoping Review of Aviation Loss of Control Inflight Research
Loss of control – inflight (LOC-I) contributes to aircraft accidents at unacceptably high rates. Significant industry efforts and research have aimed to improve LOC-I prevention, detection, and recove…
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2024 · SKYbrary article Loss of Control In-Flight (LOC-I) — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary comprehensive knowledge-base entry on Loss of Control In-Flight — definitions, contributing factors, accident case studies (Air France 447, Colgan 3407), and prevention strategies.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (International Conference on Networking and Services) Risk Assessment of Loss of Control In-Flight Trajectories for Urban Air Mobility Safety
In Urban Air Mobility (UAM), maintaining a minimum separation between aircraft is a safety requirement, which becomes challenging amidst congested air traffic and off-nominal conditions, such as Loss …
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2022 · Accident report Loss of Control on Takeoff in Icing Conditions — Citation 560XL
Cessna Citation 560XL fatal takeoff icing accident, March 2018. Investigation of a Citation 560XL loss-of-control takeoff accident in icing conditions.
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aviation) ANALYSIS OF GENERAL AVIATION FIXED-WING AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS INVOLVING INFLIGHT LOSS OF CONTROL USING A STATE-BASED APPROACH
Inflight loss of control (LOC-I) is a significant cause of General Aviation (GA) fixed-wing aircraft accidents. The United States National Transportation Safety Board’s database provides a rich source…
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Presentation Use of Design of Experiments in Determining Neural Network Architectures for Loss of Control Detection
Abstract—We describe empirical methods for selecting a neural network architecture to implement belief state inference on generic commercial transport aircraft.