NTSB CAROL · Event
Event BFO95LA063
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A LOSS OF ENGINE POWER FOR AN UNDETERMINED REASON(S).
Factual narrative
On June 11, 1995, at about 1000 eastern daylight time, a Beech F33A, N1775B, piloted by the private pilot rated registered owner, collided with terrain during an attempted go-around after a low pass over runway 24 at the Potomac Airfield, in Friendly, Maryland. The pilot and the one passenger, the sole occupants, received minor injuries. The airplane was destroyed. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed. The personal flight departed Manteo, North Carolina, about 0815, and was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to the pilot, shortly after takeoff from the flight's last departure point, he retracted the landing gear and got "...2 green and one amber light." He stated he thought the landing gear did not retract correctly and decided to continue to his final destination and try to resolve the problem in flight. He stated that during the flight the "...landing gear and landing gear throttle circuit breakers popped." He said he reset the circuit breakers and they "popped" again. The pilot reported that when he got to Potomac Airfield, he broadcasted over the UNICOM frequency for someone on the ground to verify that the airplane landing gear was in the down position. He stated he made a low pass over runway 24 and began a left turn intending to fly a left hand traffic pattern. A person on the ground reported to him [the pilot] that the gear was down. The pilot stated, "...I initiated standard go-around procedures--which I'd practiced many times. There followed a dull grinding sound under the cowl and no gain in power. In order to avoid a housing development that lies just off Runway 24...I steered the aircraft toward nearby trees...." The pilot stated that the airplane descended through the trees and came to rest on the ground. Postaccident examination of the wreckage revealed that the airplane descended through trees and the fuselage came to rest inverted on the ground with the right wing attached. The right main landing gear was extended. The left wing was torn away from the fuselage and remained in the trees about 30 feet above the ground with its landing gear extended. The nose gear was extended. The empennage was detached from the fuselage and came to rest about 30 feet in front of the cabin area. The airplane's landing gear system was destroyed and could not be tested. The engine was examined and compression in all six cylinders was confirmed. Continuity throughout the engine was confirmed. The magnetos and the engine driven fuel pump functioned. Fuel was found in the fuel flow distribution unit. The throttle and mixture control cables were attached to their attachment points on the engine. No engine anomalies were noted. THE PILOT STATED THAT WHEN HE RETRACTED THE LANDING GEAR SHORTLY AFTER TAKEOFF, THE LANDING GEAR INDICATING LIGHTS SHOWED THAT THE GEAR DID NOT RETRACT PROPERLY. THE PILOT DECIDED TO CONTINUE TO THE DESTINATION AND TRY TO RESOLVE THE PROBLEM IN FLIGHT. DURING THE FLIGHT, THE 'LANDING GEAR AND LANDING GEAR THROTTLE CIRCUIT BREAKERS POPPED.' THE PILOT DECIDED TO MAKE A LOW PASS OVER THE RUNWAY AT THE DESTINATION AIRPORT FOR A GEAR EXTENSION VERIFICATION FROM SOMEONE ON THE GROUND. A PERSON ON THE GROUND REPORTED TO THE PILOT THAT THE GEAR WAS DOWN. AFTER THE LOW PASS, THE PILOT ADDED POWER TO GO AROUND AND THE ENGINE DID NOT RESPOND. THE AIRPLANE COULD NOT MAINTAIN ALTITUDE, AND THE PILOT CHOSE TO DESCEND INTO TREES RATHER THAN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. THE AIRPLANE COLLIDED WITH TREES AND CAME TO REST ON THE GROUND INVERTED. POSTACCIDENT EXAMINATION OF THE ENGINE REVEALED NO ANOMALIES. THE LANDING GEAR SYSTEM WAS DESTROYED AND COULD NOT BE TESTED. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1995_BFO95LA063.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗