CEN10LA430
2010-07-24 · Spearfish, South Dakota, United States · Fatal · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport SPF
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s improper fuel management, which resulted in a loss of engine power due to fuel starvation.
Factual narrative
On July 24, 2010, at 0800 mountain daylight time, a Piper PA-28-151, N1158X, sustained substantial damage when it impacted the terrain and a tree after a loss of engine power during a go-around at the Black Hills Airport (SPF), Spearfish, South Dakota. The private pilot received minor injuries and the passenger was fatally injured. The 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight departed from Townsend Airport (8U8), Townsend, Montana, about 0500, and was stopping at SPF for fuel. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. No flight plan was filed. The pilot reported that the airplane’s airspeed was 70 mph when it was crossing the threshold for landing on runway 30 (5,498 feet by 75 feet, asphalt), which was 10 mph slower than he normally landed the airplane. He decided to execute a go-around, and he flew the length of the runway before making the crosswind turn. When he turned left onto the downwind leg, the engine stopped producing power, and he executed a forced landing to a field. He reported that he did not see a tree in the field, and the right wing impacted the tree after the airplane touched down. A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector examined the airplane and accident site. The wreckage path was about 160 feet in length on a northeasterly heading. The initial point of impact was a ground scar made by the left wingtip. The airplane’s right wing was found lodged around the trunk of a tree located about 100 feet from the initial impact point. The airplane’s main wreckage came to rest about 60 feet from the tree. The left fuel tank was full of fuel. There was no evidence of fuel in the right wing’s fuel tank. The pilot reported that there was no mechanical malfunction or failure of the airplane. He reported that he did not switch the fuel tanks prior to landing, and that the “engine quit due to fuel starvation.” The direct flight distance between 8U8 and SPR is about 344 nautical miles. The pilot reported that the airplane’s airspeed was 70 mph when it was crossing the runway threshold, which was 10 mph slower than he normally landed the airplane. He decided to execute a go-around and flew the length of the runway before making the crosswind turn. When he turned left onto the downwind leg, the engine stopped producing power and he executed a forced landing to a field. He reported that he did not see a tree in the field and the right wing impacted the tree after the airplane touched down. Postaccident inspection of the left fuel tank revealed that it was full of fuel. There was no evidence of fuel in the right wing’s fuel tank. The pilot reported that there was no mechanical malfunction or failure of the airplane and that he did not switch the fuel tanks prior to landing, causing the engine to lose power due to fuel starvation. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Fluids/misc hardware-Fluids-Fuel-Fluid level - C
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Incorrect action performance-Pilot - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_CEN10LA430.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel starvation, go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…