CEN13LA397
2013-07-05 · Nappanee, Indiana, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport C03
Current FAA registration · N502EU
- Make / Model
- PIPER PA 46-350P
- Year of manufacture
- 1995 · 18 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING TIO-540-AE2A (350 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 6 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20070918
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A641D5
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The failure of the No. 6 piston due to detonation and the subsequent interruption of the engine oil flow that resulted from the piston fragments.
Factual narrative
On July 5, 2013, about 1230 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-46-350P airplane, N502EU, was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a loss of engine power during cruise flight near Nappanee, Indiana. The pilot was not injured. The aircraft was registered to GTG LLC and operated by the pilot under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight, which was operated on an instrument flight rules flight plan. The flight had departed from the Elkhart Municipal Airport (EKM), Elkhart, Indiana, about 1210. The intended destination was the Indianapolis Executive Airport (TYQ), Indianapolis, Indiana. The pilot reported that the takeoff and climb out were uneventful. However, upon leveling at the assigned cruise altitude of 8,000 feet mean sea level, he heard three loud "bangs." The engine oil pressure and temperature indications exceeded the gauge limit. He was unable to maintain altitude and ultimately executed a forced landing to a field located about 4 miles north-northwest of Nappanee, Indiana. The airplane came to rest upright, with substantial damage to the right wing. A postaccident engine examination was conducted under the direct supervision of a Federal Aviation Administration inspector. The examination revealed that a portion of the no. 6 piston face has separated along the perimeter. The damage appeared consistent with exposure to detonation within the cylinder during operation. The no. 5 connecting rod separated near the crankshaft journal. The lower portion of the engine crankcase exhibited a hole immediately above the oil sump. Metallic fragments were recovered from the oil sump, the oil sump screen, and the oil filter. The accident airplane was powered by a 350-horsepower Lycoming TIO-540-AE2A engine, serial number L-9578-61A. The pilot reported that the airframe and engine had accumulated 1,584.3 hours total time at the time of the accident. Maintenance records indicated that on October 19, 2012, the no. 6 cylinder was removed and a new piston, new rings, and new gaskets were installed due to excessive oil consumption. The engine had accumulated 39.5 hours since the work was performed. The records noted that 8 days earlier, on October 11, 2012, the no. 4 cylinder was removed and new rings and gaskets were installed due to excessive oil consumption. The most recent annual inspection was performed on September 11, 2012, at 1,535.4 hours total airframe/engine time. The engine maintenance logbook did not contain any entries subsequent to the October 19th cylinder replacement. The pilot reported that, upon leveling the airplane at the assigned cruise altitude, he heard three loud "bangs" and that the engine oil pressure and temperature indications exceeded the gauge limits. He was unable to maintain altitude and subsequently executed a forced landing to a field. A postaccident engine examination revealed that a portion of the No. 6 piston face had separated along the perimeter due to detonation within the cylinder during operation. The No. 5 connecting rod had separated near the crankshaft journal, and the lower portion of the engine crankcase exhibited a hole immediately above the oil sump. Metallic fragments were recovered from the oil sump, oil sump screen, and oil filter. Piston fragments likely interrupted the oil flow within the engine, which resulted in the failure of the No. 5 connecting rod. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-Recip eng cyl section-Failure - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-Recip eng oil sys-Damaged/degraded - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2013_CEN13LA397.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.