CHI06LA058
2006-01-05 · Woodruff, Wisconsin, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport ARV
N391QS has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (EMBRAER EXECUTIVE AIRCRAFT INC EMB-505, built 2016), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The Captain's failure to maintain adequate airspeed during the landing which resulted in a stall/mush. Factors were the gusty conditions, the snowbank in the safety area next to the runway, and the runway light that the airplane struck.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On January 5, 2006, about 0800 central standard time, a Cessna 560, N391QS, operated by NetJets Sales, Inc., sustained substantial damage when the right wing contacted runway 36 during a landing at the Lakeland Airport/Noble F. Lee Memorial Field (ARV), near Minocqua-Woodruff, Wisconsin. The airplane subsequently departed the runway and impacted a snow bank. The non-scheduled domestic passenger flight was operating under 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 135. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The flight was operating on an activated instrument flight rules flight plan. The pilot, co-pilot, and five passengers were uninjured. The flight originated from the Palwaukee Municipal Airport (PWK), near Wheeling, Illinois about 0723. The operator's accident report, in part, stated: N391QS departed KPWK enroute to KARV with 5 passengers on a part 135 flight. The enroute portion of the flight was without event. The crew verified the weather and landing numbers enroute. In light of a notam for the AWOS [automated surface observing system] wind readout at KARV as being unreliable the crew procured the latest weather from KRHI [Rhinelander-Oneida County Airport, Rhinelander, Wisconsin] enroute to validate the winds and that landing on runway 36 at KARV was suitable. The crew briefed and flew the localizer approach to runway 36 at KARV. The briefed REF speed [airspeed at the 50-foot point with flaps in the landing position and landing gear extended] was 101 knots. Due to weather conditions the Captain flew the approach at 110 knots. The crew encountered light rime icing descending through 4,500 feet until the time they broke out visually at approximately 2,600 feet. The crew utilized the aircraft boots 3 times on the approach to ensure the aircraft was free of contamination. The crew descended on the PAPI [precision approach path indicator] for runway 36 after breaking out visually. At approximately 55 feet the Captain brought the power levers to idle as normal. All seemed normal until approximately 20 to 30 feet when the aircraft felt as if it lost lift and the right wing dropped. The Captain added power and took both hands to level the wings. The aircraft impacted the runway with the right wingtip hitting first. The aircraft then bounced back in the air and turned slightly to the right. The aircraft then once again settled to the surface off the right side of the runway. In an interview, the Captain stated that the stick shaker came on and that he added engine power during the landing. The first officer (FO) stated that the airplane's airspeed dropped to REF -4 to -5 knots when the airplane was about 20 feet above ground level.
DAMAGE TO AIRCRAFT
The operator reported that the airplane's "nose landing gear wheel assembly and nose landing gear strut fork separated from the aircraft. Right side nose landing gear door separated from aircraft. Damage to radome, fuselage structure aft of nose landing gear well, right wing inboard flap panel and attaching structure, right wing upper and lower surfaces, and right wing tip."
OTHER DAMAGE
The operator also reported that the airplane "struck and destroyed a runway light marker light."
PERSONNEL INFORMATION
Captain: The captain held an airline transport pilot (ATP) certificate with an airplane multiengine land rating. He was type-rated for the Cessna 500 airplane. His last medical examination was completed on August 8, 2005, and he was issued a first-class medical certificate without limitations. The operator reported the captain as having accumulated a total flight time of 8,452 hours and 1,792 hours in the same make and model airplane. He flew 131 hours during the last 3 months, 36 hours during the previous 30 days, and 2 hours during the prior 24 hours. First Officer: The FO held an ATP certificate with an airplane multiengine land rating. He was type-rated for the Cessna 500 airplane. His last medical examination was completed on July 7, 2005, and he was issued a first-class medical certificate without limitations. The operator reported the FO as having a total flight time of 3,200 hours, and 72 hours in the same make and model airplane. He flew 69 hours during the last 3 months, 34 hours during the previous 30 days, and 2 hours during the prior 24 hours.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
N391QS was a twin engine Cessna 560, serial number 560-0429. The airplane was configured with eight seats and had a maximum gross weight of 16,300 pounds. The airplane was powered by two Pratt and Whitney Canada engines rated at 3,045 pounds of thrust each. The last approved inspection program maintenance inspection was conducted on December 3, 2005. The airplane had accumulated a total time of 6,276 hours. The airplane's flight control was through conventional cable-operated surfaces. Trimming was provided by aileron, elevator, and rudder tabs. The airplane incorporated hydraulically operated speed brakes and trailing edge flaps. The airplane's operating manual, in part, stated: STALL WARNING - STICK SHAKER Stall warning is achieved by the use of a stick shaker mounted on the forward side of the pilot's control column. An electric motor with rotating weights induces a vibration feel to the control column. The pilot is alerted to impending stall by the vibration of the control column which occurs approximately 8% to 10% above the actual stall speed. Stick shaker activation will occur before stall buffet, except in the clean configuration where they are nearly the same and either could occur first. The stick shaker is energized by inputs from the angle-of-attack system. The test switch located on the pilot's switch panel provides a means of checking the shaker prior to flight. ... Speed control on final should be precise for optimum landing performance and this is best accomplished by establishing VREF airspeed well before crossing the threshold. In gusty wind conditions, it is recommended that one half the gust factor in excess of 5 knots be added to VREF. Approaching within approximately 50 feet of airport elevation, power should be gradually reduced to counter the acceleration induced by ground effect. Wind velocity and direction will dictate the rate at which the throttles are retarded. In very high surface headwind conditions, as an example, it may be necessary to maintain at or near approach power until close to touchdown. With a tailwind, a fairly rapid power reduction may be necessary in the final descent to landing phase for accurate speed control. In ground effect, where induced drag is reduced, leaving approach power on will cause the airplane to float to a longer touchdown than desired. Retarding the throttles gradually in the final descent will normally result in idle thrust being reached just before touchdown. ... CAUTION IN ICING CONDITIONS, A SMALL AMOUNT OF RESIDUAL ICE WILL FORM ON UNPROTECTED AREAS. THIS IS NORMAL, BUT CAN CAUSE AN INCREASE IN STALL SPEEDS. WHEN ANY AMOUNT OF RESIDUAL ICE IS VISIBLE, THE STALL SPEEDS IN FIGURE 4-7 OF THE AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL INCREASE BY 5 KNOTS. THE VREF/VAPP SPEEDS, LANDING DISTANCES AND THE MAXIMUM LANDING WEIGHT PERMITTED BY BRAKE ENERGY MUST BE CORRECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIGURE 4-32 OF THE AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL.
METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION
At 0755, the recorded weather at ARV was: Wind 350 degrees at 14 gusting to 21 knots; visibility 10 statute miles; sky condition overcast 1,300 feet above ground level; temperature -3 degrees C; dew point -5 degrees C; altimeter 30.04 inches of mercury.
AIDS TO NAVIGATION
ARV has a localizer approach to runway 36. The final approach fix, identified as DOUGY, is located 6.5 distance measuring equipment (DME) miles south of ARV. The published altitude at DOUGY is at or above 3,200 feet msl. After crossing DOUGY, an aircraft can descend to the minimum descent altitude of 1,980 feet msl.
AIRPORT INFORMATION
ARV is located about three miles northwest of the town of Woodruff, Wisconsin. The airport has two intersecting runways. Runway 10/28 is a 3,062 foot by 75-foot asphalt runway. Runway 18/36 is a 5,150 foot by 100-foot asphalt runway.
FLIGHT RECORDERS
The cockpit voice recorder, a Fairchild Model A200S part number S200-0012-00 serial number 01808, was auditioned and was returned to the operator.
WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION
The airplane came to rest upright east of runway 36 about 50 to 100 feet in a snowbank. A Federal Aviation Administration Inspector's picture showed that the airplane contacted runway 36 about 90 feet north of the approach end of the runway. An on-scene examination of the wreckage revealed no pre-impact anomalies. The captain stated that there were no mechanical malfunctions with the airplane in reference to the flight.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The parties to the investigation included the FAA, NetJets Sales, Inc., and Cessna Aircraft Company. The airplane wreckage and retained item were released to a representative of the operator. The airplane, on a non-scheduled domestic passenger flight, sustained substantial damage when the right wing contacted runway 36 during landing. The airplane subsequently departed the runway and impacted a snow bank. The operator stated, "The briefed REF [airspeed at the 50-foot point with flaps in the landing position and landing gear extended] speed was 101 knots. Due to weather conditions the Captain flew the approach at 110 knots. The crew encountered light rime icing descending through 4,500 feet until the time they broke out visually at approximately 2,600 feet. The crew utilized the aircraft boots 3 times on the approach to ensure the aircraft was free of contamination. The crew descended on the PAPI [precision approach path indicator] for runway 36 after breaking out visually. At approximately 55 feet the Captain brought the power levers to idle as normal. All seemed normal until approximately 20 to 30 feet when the aircraft felt as if it lost lift and the right wing dropped. The Captain added power and it took both hands to level the wings. The aircraft impacted the runway with the right wingtip hitting first. The aircraft then bounced back in the air and turned slightly to the right. The aircraft then once again settled to the surface off the right side of the runway." The airplane impacted a runway light. The Captain stated that the stick shaker came on and that he added engine power during the landing. The first officer stated that the airplane's airspeed dropped to REF -4 to -5 knots when the airplane was about 20 feet above ground level. The recorded wind was 350 degrees at 14 gusting to 21 knots. A caution in the airplane's operating manual stated, "IN ICING CONDITIONS, A SMALL AMOUNT OF RESIDUAL ICE WILL FORM ON UNPROTECTED AREAS. THIS IS NORMAL, BUT CAN CAUSE AN INCREASE IN STALL SPEEDS. WHEN ANY AMOUNT OF RESIDUAL ICE IS VISIBLE, THE STALL SPEEDS IN FIGURE 4-7 OF THE AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL INCREASE BY 5 KNOTS. THE VREF/VAPP SPEEDS, LANDING DISTANCES AND THE MAXIMUM LANDING WEIGHT PERMITTED BY BRAKE ENERGY MUST BE CORRECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIGURE 4-32 OF THE AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL." Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2006_CHI06LA058.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, stall, maintenance). All research papers
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2022 · Accident report Loss of Control on Takeoff in Icing Conditions — Citation 560XL
Cessna Citation 560XL fatal takeoff icing accident, March 2018. Investigation of a Citation 560XL loss-of-control takeoff accident in icing conditions.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Faculty research project Reconfigurable Guidance and Control Systems for Emerging On-Orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (OSAM) Space Vehicles
Dynamic response to emergent situations is a necessity in the on-orbit servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (OSAM) field, because traditional on-orbit guidance and control (G&C) cannot respond effic…
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR) An Evaluation of an Analytical Simulation of an Airplane with Tailplane Icing by Comparison to Flight Data
This report presents the assessment of an analytical tool developed as part of the NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program. The analytical tool is a specialized simulation program called TAILSM4 which was de…