Skip to content

Atlas / NTSB / CHI93IA280

NTSB CAROL · Event

Event CHI93IA280

1993-07-24 DANVILLE, Illinois, United States None 1 aircraft Status: Completed

Registry · N915CA

FAA Aircraft Registry record.

Make / Model

COSTRUZIONI AERONAUTICHE TECNA P2012 TRAVELLER

Year of manufacture

2020

TCDS

A00076CE · COSTRUZIONI AERONAUTICHE TECNAM S P A

Engine

LYCOMING TEO-540-C1A (375 hp)

Seats / Engines

11 seats · 2 engines

Last airworthiness date

20201010

ADS-B equipped

Yes — Mode-S ACA971

Registrant of record

HYANNIS AIR SERVICE INC

Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).

Aircraft involved

Probable cause & findings

a lightning strike and associated engine flameout.

Factual narrative

On July 24, 1993, at 0840 central daylight time (CDT), a Canadair CL 600-2B19, N915CA, operated by Comair Airlines of Cincinnati, Ohio, as flight number 3707, and piloted by airline transport rated pilots, experienced a right engine failure after being struck by lightning during a climb to its assigned altitude. The 14 CFR Part 135 passenger revenue flight was operating on an IFR flight plan in instrument meteorological conditions. The airplane sustained minor damage. The two pilots, flight attendant, and eighteen passengers reported no injuries. The flight departed from Chicago, Illinois, at 0730 CDT. The captain's NTSB Form 6120.1/2's written statement reveals the airplane was "... flying through intermittent, moderate precipitation, and moderate turbulence... ." The captain stated, "We just started a deviation to the east, left of course, to avoid a level one cell (thunderstorm)... ." After being struck by lightning several times the pilot declared an emergency at 27,000 feet when the right engine ceased operating. Shortly after descending through 15,000 feet the engine was restarted during a second attempt. The pilot requested, and was granted, a clearance to the flight's original destination. The company's Chief Inspector of Maintenance stated N915CA had many burn marks on its fuselage, wing, right engine, and elevator. The company's chief pilot stated it was his belief the lightening strike caused an interrupted airflow into the engine resulting in the flameout. Investigation into the chief pilot's statement revealed a NASA publication entitled: LIGHTNING PROTECTION OF AIRCRAFT, published during October 1977. According to this report, the turbojet engine's flameout is a "...result from disruption of the inlet air by shock wave associated with the lightning arc channel sweeping aft along a fuselage. This channel may indeed pass close in front of an engine intake, and if a restrike occurs, the accompanying shock wave is considered sufficient to disrupt engine operation." THE COMMUTER AIRLINE TURBOJET WAS CLIMBING TO ITS ASSIGNED ALTITUDE WHEN THE CAPTAIN TURNED THE AIRPLANE TO AVOID A THUNDERSTORM. DURING THE TURN THE AIRPLANE WAS STRUCK BY LIGHTENING SEVERAL TIMES AND THE RIGHT ENGINE CEASED OPERATING. THE ENGINE WAS RESTARTED AS THE AIRPLANE DESCENDED THROUGH 15,000 FEET. THE AIRPLANE CONTINUED TO ITS DESTINATION AFTER THE ENGINE WAS RESTARTED. AN ON-SCENE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THE AIRPLANE HAD NUMEROUS BURN SPOTS ON ITS FUSELAGE, WING, RIGHT ENGINE, ELEVATOR, AND RIGHT ENGINE. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12

Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file NTSB_1993_CHI93IA280.txt. Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb. Full investigation docket on data.ntsb.gov ↗.

Related research

What the literature says.

Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (engine failure, turbulence, maintenance, thunderstorm). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.

Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗