DEN01LA114
2001-06-09 · Provo, Utah, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport KPVU
Current FAA registration · N303RC
- Make / Model
- PIPER PA-34-200
- Year of manufacture
- 1971 · 30 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING I0360 SER (180 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 7 seats · 2 engines
- Last airworthiness date
- 19710928
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A32BF1
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
inadvertent retraction of the landing gear by the pilot rated student during landing roll. A contributing factors was the failure of the instructor to adequately supervise the student.
Factual narrative
On June 9, 2001, at approximately 1255 mountain daylight time, a Piper PA-34-200, N303RC, was substantially damaged during a touch-and-go landing at Provo Municipal Airport, Provo, Utah. The flight instructor and commercial pilot receiving instruction were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for this local instructional flight being conducted under Title 14 CFR Part 91. The flight originated at approximately 1100. According to telephone statements obtained by an FAA Aviation Safety Inspector in the Salt Lake City Flight Standards District Office two days after the accident, the instructor stated that they had been in the pattern doing landings and that "we came in a little fast and when we touched down we ballooned." When they touched down a second time, the right main gear and nose gear collapsed, and the airplane skidded off to the right side of the runway. The pilot receiving instruction stated that "we were doing landings and approached a little fast and when we touched down we ballooned back into the air...the instructor was yelling at me and in the confusion, I was not exactly sure what the instructor was saying." When they touched down a second time, the right main and nose landing gear collapsed, and the propellers hit the runway. The following is based on the instructor's accident report received at a later date. On the downwind leg, the pilot receiving instruction put the landing gear selector switch in the down position and all three green lights illuminated. The final approach and landing were normal. After the airplane was on the ground and the flaps were retracted, "the student is believed to have inadvertently moved the gear selector switch from the down position to the up position causing the landing gear to retract." A maintenance manager for the Utah Valley State College examined the airplane. He said that the damage was "relatively slight." The right engine firewall was wrinkled at the lower right area just above the engine mount tube attachment point. Additional damage included the step aft of the right wing, wing and belly skins, the right hand wing tip, nose landing gear doors, and both propellers. The maintenance manager stated that he found the left main landing gear to be down and locked. After lifting the airplane off the ground, the landing gear extended properly. An inspection following the accident revealed no discrepancies or damage to the gear except to the nose landing gear doors. The instructor told an FAA inspector that he and his commercial-rated student had been in the pattern doing landings. He further stated that they came in "a little fast and when we touched down we ballooned." The pilot receiving instruction stated that "we were doing landings and approached a little fast and when the airplane touched down, we ballooned back into the air...the instructor was yelling at me and in the confusion I was not exactly sure what the instructor was saying." When the airplane touched down a second time, the right main and nose landing gear collapsed, and the propellers hit the runway. The flight instructor stated that "the student is believed to have inadvertently moved the gear selector switch from the down position to the up position causing the landing gear to retract." Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2001_DEN01LA114.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…