ERA20LA018
2019-10-18 · Madisonville, Tennessee, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport MNV
Current FAA registration · N564T
- Make / Model
- BEECH N35
- Year of manufacture
- 1961 · 58 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR I0-470 SERIES (260 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 5 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19610511
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A7376F
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's unstable approach and delayed decision to go-around. Contributing to the accident was the unporting of the fuel supply following a forward slip maneuver during the approach, which resulted in the loss of engine power during the go-around.
Factual narrative
On October 18, 2019, about 1530 eastern daylight time, a Beech N35 airplane, N564T, impacted terrain and trees during a go-around at Monroe County Airport (MNV), Madisonville, Tennessee. The private pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated by the pilot as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that during the approach to MNV he decided to perform a training exercise by simulating an engine failure during the landing. He entered the traffic pattern for runway 5 and reduced power to idle; while on final approach he reported that the airplane was "a little fast and a little high" so he performed a forward slip to the left (left rudder application) for a "second or two." He continued the approach and the airplane touched down with about 1,000 ft of the 3,643 ft runway remaining and immediately bounced back into the air. The pilot decided to perform a go-around and applied power; however, the engine did not respond. The airplane flew beyond the departure end of the runway, touched down in grass, and skidded into shrubs and trees. The left and right wings sustained substantial damage. Postaccident, the pilot reported that he believed the slip maneuver "unported fuel from the right tank [selected tank for approach] and prevented the plane from throttling up." He reported that there were no mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane. Examination of the airplane by a Federal Aviation Administration inspector found no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. There were no obstructions or debris found in the fuel system and the engine produced normal power when it was test run. Inspection revealed 17 gallons of fuel in the right tank and 22 gallons in the left tank. The airplane flight manual stated in part:
FUEL CELLS
Fuel supply is carried in two bladder-type cells with a total capacity of [40 gallons, optional fuel system installed], located in the wings just outboard of the fuselage. Fuel is fed from the cells to a selector valve just forward of the front seat, on the left side, then through a strainer to the fuel pump and the engine. The fuel tank fillers are located in the wing leading edges. Maximum Slip Duration: 30 seconds for airplanes with baffled main fuel cells in both wings. The pilot reported that, during a simulated loss of engine power landing, the airplane was too fast and high, so he performed a forward slip to the left to increase the descent rate. The airplane touched down on the runway with less than 1/3 of its distance remaining and immediately bounced back into the air. The pilot added power to initiate a go-around; however, the engine did not respond, and the airplane subsequently descended into trees and terrain beyond the departure end of the runway, resulting in substantial damage to both wings. Examination revealed no anomalies with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation, and the engine produced normal power during a test run. Thus, it is likely that the fuel unported from the right tank following the forward slip to the left, and the fuel supply was interrupted as the pilot attempted the go-around. The accident would have likely been prevented if the pilot had performed a go-around earlier during the approach, when he realized that the airplane was too high and too fast to safely land on the available runway. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Pilot - C
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Delayed action-Pilot - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Airspeed-Not attained/maintained - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Descent/approach/glide path-Not attained/maintained - C
- — Aircraft-Fluids/misc hardware-Fluids-Fuel-Fluid level
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2019_ERA20LA018.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, engine failure, go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…