FTW98LA139
1998-02-24 · DALLAS, Texas, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport DAL
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The nose gear collapsed for an undetermined reason. A factor was the total electrical failure due to the separation of the alternator output lugs resulting from inadequate maintenance.
Factual narrative
On February 24, 1998, at 1535 central standard time, a Piper PA-46-350P airplane, N9254X, sustained substantial damage following a total electrical failure and a nose gear collapse during the landing roll at Dallas Love Field, Dallas, Texas. The airplane, owned by JRW Aviation, Inc., Dallas, Texas, was operated under Title 14 CFR Part 91. The commercial pilot, sole occupant, was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the personal cross country flight and a flight plan was not filed. The flight originated at Lampasas, Texas, approximately 1430. During telephone interviews, conducted by the investigator-in-charge, the director of maintenance and the pilot reported that 3 days prior to the accident, the aircraft was landed at Lampasas following a total electrical failure. The battery was replaced by company maintenance personnel and the electrical system checked operational per the manufacturer procedures. The flight departed Lampasas and the pilot was receiving vectors for a visual approach to the downwind position for runway 13L at Dallas Love Field when the aircraft lost all electrical power. The pilot performed the emergency landing gear extension procedure; however, the position of the gear could not be confirmed due to the electrical failure. The nose gear collapsed during the landing roll. The FAA inspectors and a mechanic examining the airplane found structural damage to the airframe at the area where the nose landing gear trunion mounts. The propeller and nose gear doors were damaged. Under the surveillance of the FAA inspector on March 10 and March 18, gear retraction tests were performed by the director-of-maintenance and the manufacturer representative. The landing gear "checked okay during normal and emergency extension. No interference of any kind affected the operational check." During the removal of the engine, it was found that the output lugs were broken off both alternators. The two output lugs were forwarded to the NTSB Metallurgical Laboratory. Metallurgical examination of the output lug fracture surfaces revealed "no discernable fracture features. Both parts contained evidence of electrical arcing that caused significant melting of the separated ends." A review of the maintenance records by the investigator-in-charge revealed that the last annual inspection was performed on January 21, 1998. At that time the nose gear up-roller, bushing, spring, and bolt were replaced and gear retraction tested. The airplane was determined to be in an airworthy condition. Time since the annual inspection was 12.7 hours. The Piper Aircraft Maintenance Manual (Chapter 5-20-00) inspection checklist includes the following items: Inspect wiring to engine and accessories. Replace damaged wires and clamps. Inspect terminals for security. Inspect alternator(s) for cracks, condition, and security. Check alternator output. The section of the airframe maintenance manual describing the servicing of the electrical system (Chapter 12-10-00) in part states: "The security of all electrical connections should be checked." During the landing roll, the nose gear collapsed. On a previous flight and during the approach on this flight, the aircraft experienced a total electrical failure. Following the first electrical failure, the battery was replaced by company maintenance personnel and the electrical system checked operational per the manufacturer procedures. The airframe Maintenance Manual inspection checklist states in part: Inspect wiring to engine and accessories, replace damaged wires and clamps, and inspect terminals for security. The section of the maintenance manual describing servicing the electrical system in part states: 'The security of all electrical connections should be checked.' Examination of the accident airplane revealed that the output lugs were broken off both alternators. NTSB Metallurgical examination of the fracture surfaces revealed 'no discernable fracture features. Both parts contained evidence of electrical arcing that caused significant melting of the separated ends.' A post-accident landing gear retraction test revealed no evidence of discrepancies with the landing gear system. Time since the last annual inspection was 12.7 hours. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_FTW98LA139.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Faculty research project Reconfigurable Guidance and Control Systems for Emerging On-Orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (OSAM) Space Vehicles
Dynamic response to emergent situations is a necessity in the on-orbit servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (OSAM) field, because traditional on-orbit guidance and control (G&C) cannot respond effic…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2019 · Journal article (IJAAA) Satellite Maintenance: An Opportunity to Minimize the Kessler Effect
Recently, there has been an emphasis on the growing problem of orbital debris. While the advantages of placing satellites into space are numerous, advances in satellite technology combined with the gr…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2015 · Conference paper The Implementation of Safety Management Systems in Maintenance Operations
Literature for Safety Management Systems (SMS) that apply to flight operations is abundant, but there is a limited supply of SMS-related literature for maintenance operations.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…