IAD05LA126
2005-08-26 · Corry, Pennsylvania, United States · Fatal · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 8G2
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to maintain airspeed, which resulted in an inadvertent stall and collision with terrain.
Factual narrative
On August 26, 2005, at 1530 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 172H, N3946R, was substantially damaged when it impacted terrain on approach to Corry Airport (8G2), Corry, Pennsylvania. The certificated private pilot and one passenger were seriously injured. One passenger was fatally injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the local personal flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. In a written statement, the pilot stated that as the airplane approached the runway for landing, he increased engine power. The airplane yawed "the instant I gave throttle." He attempted to correct, but the airplane "went past center" to the right and left "like someone had cut the cables. Controls were not responding at all." The pilot said he then adjusted the yoke to a "neutral" position, but the nose "came up [and] the plane went into a stall." In a telephone interview, an airport employee said he was cutting grass with a tractor as he watched the airplane approach the runway at low altitude. He was unable to hear the airplane over the sound of the tractor, but described the approach as "low and slow," with the wings rocking from side to side. The right wing then dipped, the airplane "curved" to its right, and then descended from view. Another witness watched the airplane from in front of his home. He reported to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) aviation safety inspectors that the airplane was to the right of the runway centerline during its approach. He added that the airplane was "too low and slow," and that the wings rocked. He was concerned that the aircraft would not clear the trees at the airport boundary. The airplane turned to the right, the engine speed increased, the airplane disappeared from view, and then the sounds of impact were heard. On August 27, 2005, FAA inspectors examined the airplane at the site, and all major components were accounted for at the scene. The airplane came to rest 185 feet prior to, and 85 feet right of, the runway 14 threshold. The airplane rested on its nose at the initial point of ground contact. The leading edges of both wings were crushed aft. The engine was crushed aft into the instrument panel, and the panel was destroyed. The two-bladed propeller was still attached to the engine, but the crankshaft was fractured at the propeller flange. One blade was buried beneath the engine, and one blade was above ground and unmarked. The propeller was unearthed, and the buried blade was found bent, and displayed chordwise scratching and polishing. The tail was broken off aft of the cabin, but still attached by control cables and some structure. Flight control continuity was established from the cockpit to all flight control surfaces. Fuel was observed at the gascolator. The fuel was absent of water, and only trace amounts of debris were noted. The gascolator screen was free of obstruction. The fuel line from the left wing to the fuselage was fractured by impact, and evidence of fuel spillage was observed. The right fuel line and the crossover line were intact, and fuel was observed in the right tank. First responders cut the left front seat belt, while assisting the pilot. They reported, and their photos confirmed, that the front seat passenger was not wearing his seatbelt. Examination of the passenger front seat belt halves revealed that they were unlatched, and intact, with no deformation observed. The seat belt halves in the back seat were attached to the floor, and the webbing was stretched at the attach points. The buckle was latched, and the webbing on the male half of the belt was separated about halfway between the buckle and the attach point. The seatbelts were not factory-installed parts, but an aftermarket purchase. The airplane was not equipped with shoulder harnesses. On August 28, 2005, the engine was examined at Corry Airport. The engine was rotated by hand, and continuity was established through the powertrain and valvetrain to the accessory section. Compression was confirmed on all cylinders using the thumb method. The ignition leads were damaged by impact. The left magneto distributor cover was removed, and fashioned into a test harness. The test harness was attached to each magneto, and the engine was again rotated by hand. Each magneto produced spark at all leads of the harness. The airplane was a 1967 Cessna 172H, with 5,464 total airframe hours. It's most recent annual inspection was completed August 28, 2004. The most recent 100-hour inspection was completed July 14, 2005. The pilot held a private pilot certificate with a rating for airplane single engine land. The certificate was issued June 8, 2005. His most recent third class medical certificate was issued June 27, 2005. Examination of the pilot's logbook revealed that he had logged 93 total hours of flight experience. At 1458, the weather reported at the Jamestown Airport (JHW), Jamestown, New York, 23 nautical miles northeast of the Corry Airport included scattered clouds at 8,000 feet and winds from 200 degrees at 5 knots. The pilot stated that the airplane yawed when he added power on final approach to the runway. The wings rocked, the controls became unresponsive, and the airplane "stalled." Witnesses reported that the airplane approached the runway "low and slow," and that the wings "rocked." The right wing then dipped, the airplane "curved" to its right, and then descended from view. The pilot and a back seat passenger survived the accident, but the front seat passenger was fatally injured. Emergency workers reported that the passenger's seat belt was not fastened. Examination of the airplane revealed no mechanical anomalies. A review of pilot records revealed that he had accumulated 93 total hours of flight experience. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2005_IAD05LA126.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER) Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…