Skip to content

LAX95LA102

1995-01-13 · WICKENBURG, Arizona, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed

Airport E25

Current FAA registration · N2183B

Make / Model
LUSCOMBE 8F
Year of manufacture
1949 · 46 years old at event
Engine
CONT MOTOR C90 SERIES (95 hp)
Seats / Engines
2 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19560315
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A1D9FD

Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).

Aircraft involved

Probable cause & findings

THE PILOT-RATED PASSENGER'S FAILURE TO MAINTAIN DIRECTIONAL CONTROL OF THE AIRPLANE DURING THE TAKEOFF GROUND ROLL, AND THE PILOT-IN-COMMAND'S INADEQUATE SUPERVISION OF THE PILOT-RATED PASSENGER, WHO HAD SOLE ACCESS TO THE AIRPLANE'S BRAKES.

Factual narrative

On January 13, 1995, at 1530 mountain standard time, a Luscombe 8F, N2183B, owned and operated by Gavin and Patricia Murray, crashed during takeoff at the Wickenburg Municipal Airport, Wickenburg, Arizona. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the personal flight. The airplane was substantially damaged. The airline transport certificated pilot and pilot-rated passenger received minor injuries. The personal flight was originating at the time of the accident. The pilot reported that during the takeoff roll on runway 05 the passenger was initially handling the flight controls. After accelerating without difficulty to between 30 and 40 miles per hour, the airplane suddenly veered right, and the pilot took the controls. The pilot further indicated that he was not able to redirect the airplane back onto the runway, so he aborted the takeoff. The airplane crossed a parallel taxiway onto an unpaved area, entered a small ditch, and nosed over. The accident was witnessed by the airplane's owner, who was trying to sell his airplane to the pilot-rated passenger. Neither the airline transport certificated pilot nor passenger made any statement to the airplane's owner regarding having experienced any mechanical problem with the airplane during the accident flight. In February, when the National Transportation Safety Board learned of the accident, the Safety Board received a written statement from the pilot-rated passenger. The passenger reported the circumstances related to the accident flight. He did not assert having experienced any mechanical failure or having encountered gusty winds. The pilot-rated passenger reported that his prior experience flying in the same model of conventional gear airplane was about 2.0 hours. The pilot-in-command completed the Safety Board's "Aircraft Accident Report," NTSB Form 6120.1. In the report, the pilot wrote, in part, that he was "an experienced tail wheel instructor," and was also current in conventional gear airplanes. Regarding controls installed in the airplane, the pilot reported that wheel brake pedals were only located on the left side, and he was seated on the right side. THE PILOT-IN-COMMAND (CFI) IN THE RIGHT SEAT PERMITTED THE PILOT-RATED PASSENGER TO TAKE OFF IN THE CONVENTIONAL GEAR AIRPLANE. THE INITIAL GROUND ROLL WAS UNREMARKABLE. HOWEVER, THE PASSENGER LOST CONTROL OF THE AIRPLANE AFTER ACCELERATING TO BETWEEN 30 AND 40 MILES PER HOUR. THE CFI ATTEMPTED TO REGAIN CONTROL OF THE AIRPLANE AS IT VEERED OFF THE RUNWAY, BUT HE WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL. THE AIRPLANE ENCOUNTERED A DITCH AND NOSED OVER. WHEEL BRAKES WERE INSTALLED ONLY ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE AIRPLANE. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12

Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file NTSB_1995_LAX95LA102.txt. Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb. Full investigation docket on data.ntsb.gov ↗.

Related research

Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). All research papers