NTSB CAROL · Event
Event LAX95LA344
Registry · N8034L
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
CAMERON BALLOONS US C-100
Engine
NONE NONE
Seats / Engines
4 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
20011019
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S AAEFF1
Registrant of record
BRIDON BALLOONS
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the pilot's failure to assure that the seat adjustment pin was properly engaged prior to takeoff.
Factual narrative
On September 29, 1995, at 1520 hours mountain standard time, a Cessna 172H, N8034L, crashed shortly after departing runway 21 at St. Johns Industrial Airpark, St. Johns, Arizona. The pilot was conducting a visual flight rules (VFR) personal flight to Ryan Field, Tucson, Arizona. The pilot filed and activated a VFR flight plan. The airplane, registered to a private individual and operated by Tyconic, Inc., Ryan Field, was destroyed. The certificated private pilot occupying the left front seat and his passenger, also a certificated private pilot, sustained fatal injuries. The left seat pilot died on September 30, 1995. Both occupants were German nationals. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed. The flight originated at Redbird Airport, Dallas, Texas, at 0537 hours. The operator reported that the left seat pilot rented and received a check-out in the airplane before departing on the accident flight. He said the pilot and passenger were touring the United States. A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Western-Pacific Region quality assurance person reported that the airplane landed at Franklin Memorial Airport, Luvington, New Mexico, at 0950 hours for fuel. The flight departed at 1015 hours and landed at St. Johns Industrial Airpark at 1500 hours. The airport manager reported that the pilot fueled the airplane before departing on the accident flight. The airplane received 31.3 gallons of fuel which topped-off the airplane's wing tanks. The manager said that the pilot appeared to do a run-up before departing. During the takeoff, the airplane appeared to accelerate normally, but then lifted off prematurely in a nose- high attitude. The airplane began to settle and then appeared to climb momentarily. When the airplane reached the departure end of the runway, it was still maintaining a nose high attitude and appeared to stall. The airplane right wing dropped and its nose rotated to a near vertical nose-down attitude and crashed. The manager said that the engine sounded normal throughout the accident sequence of events. The surface winds were from 260 degrees at 21 knots, gusting to 37 knots. An FAA inspector from the Scottsdale [Arizona] Flight Standards District Office conducted the on-site investigation. The inspector reported that he found pilot's seat ". . .jammed in the full rearward position. . .." He said that he found the seat adjustment pin in the retracted position. The adjustment pin secures the seat from moving in the seat track. There is no evidence that Cessna Service Letter SEB89-2, dated April 14, 1989, relating to a seat secondary locking device, had been accomplished. Airworthiness Directive (AD)87-20-03, concerning inspection of the seat rail tracks was complied with about 160 hours before the accident. This AD requires that the seat rail tracks be inspected every 100 hours for aircraft used for hire; all other aircraft seat rail tracks must be inspected during every annual inspection. Examination of the wreckage photographs showed that the airplane struck the ground in a near vertical nose-down attitude. Both wings leading edges were found symmetrically crushed rearward. Ground witnesses reported the airplane appeared to accelerate normally, but lifted off prematurely in a nose-high attitude. The aiplane began to settle and then appeared to climb momentarily. When the airplane reached the departure end of the runway, it was still maintaining a nose-high attitude and appeared to stall. The airplane's right wing dropped and its nose rotated to a near vertical nose-down attitude before ground impact. The witnesses reported that the engine sounded normal throughout the accident sequence. The wreckage examination revealed that the pilot's seat was jammed in a rearward position and the seat retention pin was disengaged. Cessna Service Letter SEB89-2, dated April 14, 1989, relating to a seat secondary locking device, was not accomplished. The airworthiness directive, 87-20-03, concerning the inspection of the seat rail tracks was complied with about 160 hours before the accident. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1995_LAX95LA344.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER)
Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗