MIA06LA002
2005-10-03 · Destin, Florida, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport KDTS
Current FAA registration · N9199P
- Make / Model
- PIPER PA 46-350P
- Year of manufacture
- 1990 · 15 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING TI0-540 SER (310 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 6 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19900605
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S ACBBBB
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The inadequate design of the engine mount which led to cracking of the mount resulting in a loss of directional control and collapse of the nose landing gear. A contributing factor was the failure of maintenance personnel to comply with a service bulletin to inspect the engine mount for cracks.
Factual narrative
On October 3, 2005, about 1205 central daylight time, a Piper PA-46-350P, N9199P, registered to Lookout Leasing Co. and operated by an individual as a Title 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight, veered off the runway during the landing roll at the Destin-Fort Walton Beach Airport, Destin, Florida. The private pilot and the passenger reported no injuries, and the airplane incurred substantial damage. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and location of the accident, and an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan was filed. The flight originated from the Lovell Field Airport, Chattanooga, Tennessee, about 1015. The pilot reported that the flight from Chattanooga to Destin was uneventful, and about 5 miles out from the airport, he canceled the IFR flight plan. He obtained weather information from the airport's automated surface observation system and elected to land on runway 14. The landing seemed normal for a few seconds, and then the airplane started to swerve to the right. The pilot further stated that the airplane pulled harder to the right as it slowed down, and that he tried to compensate with the application of hard left brake and full left aileron, but the airplane continued swerving to the right and departed the runway. The nose gear collapsed before the airplane came to a stop. A witness stated that he watched the airplane during the last portion of its approach and that it appeared to be a normal landing. After touchdown, the airplane began to drift to the right and only traveled a short distance, before the nose wheel struck the grass. The nose wheel immediately collapsed, and the propeller blades struck the ground and stopped. The aircraft then slid approximately 300 feet on the main landing gear and the underside of the cowling before coming to a stop. Examination of the airplane revealed that the firewall was wrinkled. Additionally, the mechanic who performed the examination noted that the engine mount was fractured at the right nose gear actuator attach foot. The mechanic reported that rust was visible on the fracture surface, indicating the crack was pre-existing. Piper Service Bulletin (SB) 1103, Engine Mount Inspection, was issued on April 22, 2002. The SB was updated on January 27, 2003 (1103A) and again on November 25, 2003 (1103B). The SB contained the following information. Purpose: It has been determined that cracks may develop on the engine mount in the area of the nose gear actuator feet. This condition typically occurs when the nose landing gear is subjected to excessive loads, possibly through hard landings, rough field operations, excessive speed turns and/or improper towing of the aircraft. PART I of this SB requires a repetitive inspection of the engine mount. PART II of this SB requires replacement of the engine mount. Compliance Time: PART I Inspection to coincide with the next regularly scheduled maintenance event, and each 100 hours time in service or annual inspection, whichever occurs first, thereafter or until PART II of this SB is accomplished. PART II Replacement if cracks are found during the inspection in PART I, replace cracked engine mount. Note: Compliance with PART II of this SB will relieve the repetitive inspection requirements of PART I of this SB. PART II: Insure the new engine mount (P/N 89137-041) has the one piece feet. The old engine mount has a two piece welded foot. This welded area is where the cracks in the engine mounts have been found. Review of the airplane's maintenance records revealed that during an annual inspection in January 2002, the engine mount was "found cracked at the lower actuator attachment point" and replaced with an overhauled engine mount. The overhauled engine mount had been repaired to the original Piper design configuration (two piece welded foot design) by a certified repair station. The most recent annual inspection was performed on January 14, 2005. As of that date, the airframe had accumulated 3,009.6 hours. The logbook entry for this annual inspection did not indicate compliance with SB 1103B Part I. Review of the checklist used by the facility that performed the annual inspection revealed that it was the 100-hour periodic inspection checklist from the Piper PA-46-310P/350P Maintenance Manual. Under the Engine Group section of the checklist, item 43, "Inspect engine mounts for cracks, corrosion, and loose mounting bolts," was initialed as complete. Under the General section of the checklist, item 2, "All Airworthiness Directives, Service Bulletins, Letters and Instructions complied with," was initialed as complete; however, the portion of this item reading, "Service Bulletins, Letters and Instructions complied with," was crossed out. At the time of the accident, the airplane had accumulated 89.1 hours since the annual inspection. The pilot reported that the landing seemed normal for a few seconds, and then the airplane started to swerve to the right. He tried to compensate with the application of hard left brake and full left aileron, but the airplane continued swerving to the right and departed the runway. The nose gear collapsed, and the airplane then slid approximately 300 feet on the main landing gear and the underside of the cowling before coming to a stop. Examination of the airplane revealed that the engine mount was fractured at the right nose gear actuator attach foot. Rust was visible on the fracture surface, indicating the crack was pre-existing. The crack was in the area that was the subject of a Piper Service Bulletin. The Service Bulletin required operators to inspect the engine mounts for cracks after every 100 hours of flight time, until the engine mount was replaced with a newer model which incorporated one-piece feet at the nose gear actuator attach points. The engine mount installed in the airplane was the original Piper design configuration (two-piece welded foot design). Review of the airplane's maintenance records indicated that the Service Bulletin had not been complied with at the most recent annual inspection conducted 89.1 flight hours prior to the accident. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2005_MIA06LA002.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.