WPR11LA471
2011-09-04 · Phoenix, Arizona, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport DVT
Current FAA registration · N316PA
- Make / Model
- PIPER PA-44-180
- Year of manufacture
- 2002 · 9 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING O-360 SERIES (180 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 2 engines
- Last airworthiness date
- 20020319
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A35E61
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's improper flare and hard landing, which resulted in the failure of the nose landing gear drag link in overstress.
Factual narrative
On September 4, 2011, about 0920 mountain standard time, a Piper PA-44-180, N316PA, experienced a nose landing gear collapse after landing at Deer Valley Airport (DVT), Phoenix, Arizona. The certified flight instructor (CFI) and private pilot were not injured. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the forward portion of the fuselage. The airplane was registered to, and operated by, Bird Acquisition LLC under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as an instructional flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed for the local flight. The CFI reported that the private pilot was practicing landings in preparation for a check ride. The second and third landings were short field landings, which were not excessively hard. The CFI stated that during the landing roll on the third landing, the nose went low, and he suspected a collapse of the oleo strut. The CFI took control, and continued to taxi down the runway while making an effort to prevent the propellers from contacting the ground. At this point, the CFI did not see, hear, or feel any indication of a prop strike. He noted that the airplane was rolling smoothly and retained steering ability as he continued to let the airplane roll out without applying the brakes. He added that use of the pedals did not give any indication of a broken linkage or mechanical impediment of any kind. As the airplane approached a taxiway, the CFI informed the air traffic control tower that the landing would be a full stop, and initiated a turn to exit the runway onto a taxiway. The turn off the runway did not reveal any problems with steering; however, the CFI had to use slight braking to stop clear of another taxiway. After contacting ground control, the CFI added power, and noticed that the airplane was moving toward the dirt area between the taxiway and the ramp. He also noted that the steering had failed, so he attempted to use differential thrust to get the airplane pointed back toward the ramp. He then heard the propellers contact the ground; he immediately shut down both engines. After exiting the airplane, he noticed that the nose gear was extended forward and resting against the most forward fuselage rib in the wheel well; the rib sustained substantial damage. Upon inspection, he saw a fractured and separated drag link at the joint in addition to hydraulic fluid leaking from the wheel well. A specialist from the National Transportation Safety Board’s Materials Laboratory examined the fractured drag link. The specialist observed that the fracture features showed rough matte gray features consistent with overstress fracture. He observed no evidence of fatigue cracking. The private pilot and certified flight instructor (CFI) were practicing a series of landings. The CFI said that the second and third landings were short field landings and were not excessively hard. During the landing roll on the third landing, the nose of the airplane lowered, and the CFI suspected a collapse of the oleo strut. The CFI took control of the airplane and taxied down the runway. The CFI stated that, during the taxi, he noted nothing irregular with the handling of the airplane and informed the tower air traffic controller that this was going to be a full stop landing. After contacting the ground controller, the CFI added power, and noticed that the steering had failed, so he attempted to use differential thrust to turn the airplane. He then heard the propellers contact the ground and immediately shut down both engines. After exiting the airplane, he noticed that the nose gear was extended forward and resting against the most forward fuselage rib in the wheel well. A postaccident examination revealed a fractured and separated drag link and hydraulic fluid leaking from the wheel well. Examination of the fractured surfaces revealed rough matte gray features consistent with an overstress fracture. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Nose/tail gear strut/axle-Capability exceeded - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Landing flare-Incorrect use/operation - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Nose/tail landing gear-Failure - C
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Incorrect action performance-Pilot - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2011_WPR11LA471.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…