WPR20FA086
2020-02-05 · Sonora, California, United States · Fatal · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport O22
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s failure to maintain clearance from trees during approach for landing.
Factual narrative
On February 5, 2020, at 1807 Pacific standard time, a Cessna 140A airplane, N9474A, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident in Columbia, California. The private pilot and passenger were fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. According to the pilots' wife, the purpose of the flight was to take the passenger to Pismo Beach, California, for a business meeting. The intent was to complete the trip during the day so he would not have to fly at night. The flight was expected to return to Columbia Airport (O22), Columbia, California by 1700 the day of the accident. According to recorded radar data provided by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the flight departed O22 and was tracked to Oceano County Airport (L52), Oceano, California. The flight departed L52 at 1543 and flew toward New Coalinga Municipal Airport (C80), Coalinga, California. The flight then flew from C80 to Harris Ranch Airport (3O8), Coalinga, California. Radar data indicated the airplane departed 3O8 about 1702 on a northbound heading. The airplane’s altitude varied between 2,000 and 3,000 ft mean sea level (msl) as it continued toward O22. When the airplane was about 1.5 nautical miles (nm) from runway 35 at O22, it turned slightly to the right, consistent with a straight-in approach to runway 35, descending slightly until track data was lost about .75 nm from the approach end of runway 35. A witness near the accident site reported that he was working on his ranch when the daylight started to fade. He estimated it was around dusk when he heard a loud bang. He looked toward the noise and saw the airplane for about 3 seconds before he heard another bang followed by silence. Prior to that he heard the airplane's engine and noted it was not making any unusual sounds. The first identified point of impact was a 50-foot pine tree about 300 ft south of the main wreckage where portions of the left wing were found. The airplane came to rest inverted in-between two trees in a pasture at an elevation of 2,020 ft msl. The right wing separated and came to rest in low-lying branches. The left wing had partially separated and was wrapped around a tree. The empennage and the tail section remained attached to the cabin area with the tail section raised and leaning against a tree. The engine remained attached to the firewall in its normal position on the airframe; however, the propeller separated and came to rest underneath the right side of the airplane. A postaccident examination of the airplane revealed both fuel tanks were breached, and about 1 gallon of fuel was drained from the LEFT fuel tank. The fuel color was blue and it tested negative for water contamination. The engine was rotated by hand at the accessory section; valve train continuity was established throughout the engine and thumb compression was obtained on all cylinders. The magnetos remained attached to their respective mounting pads; both magnetos produced spark at their respective leads. The oil screen contained a small amount of metal shavings and organic debris. The carburetor also had some organic matter in the inlet screen; however, the carburetor was disassembled with no anomalies noted. Fuel records obtained from 3O8, indicated that the airplane was fueled with approximately 20 gallons of 100 low-lead aviation fuel at 1656. A review of the airplane’s logbooks indicated the last annual inspection was conducted on October 15, 2016. Weather recorded at O22 at 1755 included 10 miles visibility and clear skies. Sunset occurred at 1729 and dusk was recorded at 1756. The investigation was unable to determine the pilot’s total or recent flight time, including flight time at night. The pilot performed an uneventful cross-country flight to take the passenger to a business meeting. He intended to complete the trip during the day (and return to the home airport by 1700), so he would not have to fly at night. Radar data indicated the airplane stopped at four airports before departing for the final leg to the home airport. The final stop included fueling the airplane with approximately 20 gallons of 100 low-lead aviation fuel and departing at 1702. The airplane flew on a northbound heading for about an hour, varying its altitude between 2,000 and 3,000 ft mean sea level (msl) as it continued toward the home airport. When the airplane was about 1.5 nautical miles (nm) from the runway, it turned slightly to the right, consistent with a straight-in approach. It descended gradually until track data were lost about .75 nm from the approach end of the runway. The airplane impacted a tree with its left wing and then continued about 300 ft before coming to rest inverted between two trees. The accident occurred 39 minutes after sunset and 11 minutes after dusk. A witness near the accident site reported that he was working on his ranch when the daylight started to fade. He estimated it was around dusk when he heard a loud bang. He looked toward the noise and saw the airplane for about 3 seconds before he heard another bang, followed by silence. Prior to that, he heard the airplane's engine and noted it was not making any unusual sounds. A postaccident examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The fact that the pilot did not want to fly at night indicated some apprehension on his part, and his night flying experience could not be determined. It is possible the pilot was distracted by the night conditions and unaware of what the approach to the airport looked like at night. He likely did not see the tree along the flightpath before the airplane’s impact. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Altitude-Not attained/maintained
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2020_WPR20FA086.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type. All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Quantifying the Reality Gap for RL-Based UAV Placement at mmWave and Sub-THz
Reinforcement learning (RL) policies for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) placement in mmWave and sub-terahertz networks are typically trained on simplified analytical channels.
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint On the shape of ice stalagmites
The growth of ice stalagmites obtained by the solidification of impacting droplets on a cooled substrate ($-50^{\circ}$C to $-140^{\circ}$C) is investigated experimentally.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Particulate Emissions Hazards Associated with Fueling Heat Engines
All hydrocarbon- (HC-) fueled heat engine exhaust (tailpipe) emissions (<10 to 140 nm) contribute as health hazards, including emissions from transportation vehicles (e.g., aircraft) and other HC-fuel…
- NASA NTRS 2016 · Conference Paper United Airlines LOFT training
Line oriented training is used in a broader, more generic sense that as a specific program under FAR 12.1409 and AC 120-35.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2016 · Conference paper Late Morning Concurrent Sessions: Innovations in Aviation Technologies: Presentation: Wingsuit Materials Research – The Effect of Currently Used Materials on Wingsuit Aerodynamics.
While wingsuit flight is exhilarating and one of the fastest growing facets of sport skydiving, current wingsuit performance is poor at best.
- NASA NTRS 2013 · Conference Paper Thermodynamic and fluid mechanic analysis of rapid pressurization in a dead-end tube
Three models have been applied to very rapid compression of oxygen in a dead-ended tube. Pressures as high as 41 MPa (6000 psi) leading to peak temperatures of 1400 K are predicted.