Skip to content

SMS Derived vs. Public Perceived Risk in Aviation Technology Acceptance (Literature Review)

Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons · Journal article (IJAAA) · oai:commons.erau.edu:ijaaa-1141 · Published 2016-11-21 · Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University · 1 author

Abstract and citation only, verbatim from Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons; full text lives there. All credit to the authors and Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.

Abstract

Aviation technology progressed from the first airplane flight to landing on the moon in just 63 years with continued progress today. Thus, organizations like commercial airlines and the National Aeronautics and Space Agency (NASA) that use a Safety Management System (SMS) are periodically implementing technology changes. Typically, two different processes are used to derive SMS and public perceived risk. Disparity between the two processes coupled with dissimilar influencing factors has, at times, frequently slowed or halted technology implementation. Understanding both processes and influencing factors using a literature review allows for a more proactive approach in implementing technology, aids in gauging public support, and provides the knowledge to attempt to change the public’s already formed perceived risk.

Author

  • Myers, Paul L, III Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Keywords

  • SMS
  • Perceived Risk
  • Aviation Technology
  • Cognition and Perception

Citation

Myers, Paul L, III (2016). SMS Derived vs. Public Perceived Risk in Aviation Technology Acceptance (Literature Review). Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons ID oai:commons.erau.edu:ijaaa-1141. https://commons.erau.edu/ijaaa/vol3/iss4/1 ↗