Atlas / Learn / Papers / 20240005122
NASA NTRS · Presentation
Where and How Well Do Cabin Crew Sleep During Long-Haul Flights?
Attribution
This is the abstract and citation. Full text lives at NASA NTRS — we link out rather than host. All credit to the authors and Ames Research Center.
Abstract
Verbatim from NASA NTRS. Not paraphrased, not summarized.
INTRODUCTION: Sleep loss and circadian disruption pose a significant risk in aviation. Many studies have shown that inflight rest locations influence alertness and performance among pilots, but few studies have evaluated cabin crew. The aim of this research was to assess sleep outcomes among cabin crewmembers sleeping in a bunk during both outbound and inbound compared to alternating sleep in a bunk or a jump seat during one long-haul route. METHODS: Twenty-nine (5 male) cabin crewmembers (Mage = 30.61, SD = 2.91) flew the same long-haul route (outbound and inbound) with a flight duration of 10:41 (± 0:14) hours. Participants were randomly assigned to fly on an aircraft with a bunk in both directions or to fly an aircraft with a bunk in one direction and with a high comfort jump seat (HCJS) in the other direction for their sleep opportunity. They wore an Actiwatch throughout the entire study and completed a sleep diary at bedtime and upon waking for each sleep opportunity. Seventy-seven percent of the flights had a bunk and 23% had a HCJS. A series of mixed-effects models were performed to assess the differences in several sleep parameters when crewmembers slept in the bunk during both directions of the flight (bunk-only) compared to sleep obtained in the HCJS during one direction and bunk in the other (bunk+HCJS). RESULTS: Fifty-seven flights were included in the analyses. There were significant differences between sleep time (b = 22.56, SE = 9.07, p = .02, Hedges’ g = -0.65) and sleep efficiency (b = 16.75, SE = 4.49, p = .001, Hedges’ g = -1.07) obtained in bunk-only vs. bunk+HCJS. Crewmembers obtained more sleep and had better sleep efficiency when they slept only in the bunk compared to bunk+HCJS. DISCUSSION: Our results showed that cabin crewmembers slept longer and had better sleep efficiency when they used the bunk. Further research is needed to understand how subjective sleepiness and subsequent performance are influenced by sleep opportunity in a bunk-only compared to bunk+HCJS.
Authors
- Lucia Arsintescu San Jose State University
- CJ Hilditch San Jose State University
- S Pradhan San Jose State University
- KB Gregory Ames Research Center
- EE Flynn-Evans Ames Research Center
Keywords
- long-haul
- aviation
- sleep
- cabin crew
Citation: Lucia Arsintescu, CJ Hilditch, S Pradhan , et al. (2024). Where and How Well Do Cabin Crew Sleep During Long-Haul Flights?. Ames Research Center. NASA NTRS ID 20240005122. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240005122 ↗