Skip to content

Atlas / Learn / Papers / 20240005495

NASA NTRS · Presentation

The Impact of Controlled Rest on Neurobehavioral Outcomes at Top-of-Descent

Published 2024-06-01 From Ames Research Center 5 authors

Attribution

This is the abstract and citation. Full text lives at NASA NTRS — we link out rather than host. All credit to the authors and Ames Research Center.

Abstract

Verbatim from NASA NTRS. Not paraphrased, not summarized.

INTRODUCTION: Long and irregular working hours can lead to fatigue in aviation operations. In some regions, a short nap taken on the flight deck (known as controlled rest) can be used as a countermeasure to unexpected in-flight sleepiness. We aimed to investigate the impact of taking controlled rest on neurobehavioral measures at top-of-descent. METHODS: Data from 120 long-haul (> 6 h flight duration), unaugmented flights were analyzed (n = 31 pilots). Pilots wore actigraphs and completed sleep logs before and during trips. At pre-flight and top-of-descent, pilots completed a 5-minute psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS). A series of mixed-effects models were conducted to assess the impact of controlled rest on outcome measures at top-of-descent. Sleep duration in the prior 48 hours, timing of the flight, and pre-flight scores for each measure were included as covariates. RESULTS: Due to missing data, complete data from 76 flights (n = 28 participants) were available in the models examining the PVT metrics, and data from 83 flights (n = 29 participants) were available in the analyses of the KSS. Pilots who took controlled rest had faster response speeds at top-of-descent (p = .03, η2p = 0.07; estimated marginal mean [EMM] = 4.19, standard error [SE] = 0.07, 95% CI [4.08, 4.29]) than those who did not take controlled rest (EMM = 4.00, SE = 0.05, 95% CI [3.86, 4.14]). There were no differences by controlled rest status for KSS scores and PVT lapses (p values > .05, η2p values ≤ 0.01). DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that taking controlled rest may improve vigilant attention at critical phases of flight and, thus, may be a useful fatigue management tool during unaugmented flights. Further research is necessary to determine the impact of factors on the decision to take controlled rest (e.g., airline culture, personal preference) and how the controlled rest policy is applied in practice.

Authors

  • Cassie J Hilditch San Jose State University
  • Lucica Arsintescu San Jose State University
  • Sean Pradhan San Jose State University
  • Kevin Gregory Ames Research Center
  • Erin Flynn-evans Ames Research Center

Keywords

  • aviation
  • sleep
  • fatigue countermeasure

Citation: Cassie J Hilditch, Lucica Arsintescu, Sean Pradhan , et al. (2024). The Impact of Controlled Rest on Neurobehavioral Outcomes at Top-of-Descent. Ames Research Center. NASA NTRS ID 20240005495. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240005495 ↗