System-Wide Error Attribution in Multi-Vehicle Operations: Theoretical Explanation, Implications, and Applications

Abstract

Verbatim from NASA NTRS. Not paraphrased, not summarized.

In multi-vehicle aerial operation contexts, a single or several human operators (m) are responsible for managing multiple uncrewed vehicles (N). This is referred to as the m:N operational paradigm. When automation error occurs during m:N operations, especially if multiple vehicles exhibit automation error, a question is raised: What level of system globality will the error be attributed to? Globality refers to the levels within the conceptual hierarchy of a perceptual object. Significant costs could be incurred if the error is falsely attributed to a higher globality level than it should be (e.g., multiple groups of vehicles as opposed to a single vehicle), and those vehicles are subsequently subject to grounding and evaluation/maintenance. Likewise, it could be problematic if error is falsely attributed to a component (i.e., a lower globality level), resulting in ongoing, unsafe operation of vehicles that should be grounded or evaluated. Thus, to meet required safety standards and facilitate commercial viability, multi-vehicle operators must be capable of appropriately attributing the level of globality of automation error within the system they are responsible for.

Authors

• Elliot L Biltekoff Langley Research Center
• Eric T Chancey Langley Research Center
• Mike S Politowicz Langley Research Center

Keywords

• Error
• Automation
• AAM
• UAM
• Perception
• m:N
• Gestalt
• Expertise