Safety Assessment of Conformance Monitoring for Situational Awareness in UTM Operations

Abstract

Verbatim from NASA NTRS. Not paraphrased, not summarized.

This report presents a systematic approach to evaluating the safety benefit of utilizing strategic deconfliction and Conformance Monitoring for Situational Awareness to manage the traffic that is comprised of both conforming aircraft and contingent aircraft. First, we developed a Monte-Carlo-based simulation platform that generates a range of nominal flight paths, a set of flight paths associated with contingent aircraft, encounters between conforming and contingent aircraft, and simulates aircraft's reported positions within conformance bounds. Next, we derived the mathematical equations for quantifying the level of safety, represented by the probability of mid-air collision per flight hour, using the flight data from the simulation platform. Finally, we compared the safety benefit of CMSA services in scenarios generated at different traffic densities and rates of contingent aircraft. This study suggests that strategic deconfliction and CMSA services can collaboratively handle traffic mixed with conforming and contingent aircraft more safely than strategic deconfliction alone.

Authors

• Vincent H Kuo Metis Technology Solutions, Inc.
• Min Xue Ames Research Center
• Priyank Pradeep Universities Space Research Association
• José Ignacio de Alvear Cárdenas San Jose State University
• Seungman Lee Ames Research Center

Keywords

• CMSA
• Nonconforming
• Contingent
• Mid-Air Collision