FTW96IA024
1995-10-24 · DFW AIRPORT, Texas, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
N263AT has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (PIPER PA-44-180, built 2001), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
'O' ring failure in the fuel line to the left engine nozzle assemblies, which resulted in a fuel line leak and a left engine compartment fire.
Factual narrative
On October 24, 1995, at 1524 central daylight time, an Aerospatiale ATR 72-212, N263AT, registered to AMR Corporation, and operated by Simmons Airlines as flight 3588, on a Title 14 CFR Part 121 scheduled domestic flight, experienced an inflight fire on the #1 engine while on approach to the Dallas/Ft.Worth International Airport, Texas. The airplane sustained minor damage and there were no injuries to the 4 crewmembers or 64 passengers aboard the airplane. The flight originated in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, at 1459. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and an IFR flight plan was filed. According to the operator, approximately 30 minutes short of the destination, the left engine experienced a 20% loss of torque. The flight crew contacted their maintenance operations center (MOC) and informed them of the cockpit indications they were experiencing. Company MOC informed the crew that they might be experiencing a possible fuel nozzle leak on that engine. As the captain was discussing the possibility of an engine shut down with the first officer, the #1 fire warning light illuminated and the fire horn was activated. The captain secured the engine, and discharged the #1 fire agent. Immediately following the discharge of the fire suppression agent, the associated warning light in the fire handle and condition lever were extinguished. At 1554 the airplane landed on Runway 13R at DFW Airport, with emergency equipment standing by. After clearing the runway, and stopping on the high speed taxiway to confirm that there was no engine fire, the airplane taxied to the ramp where the passengers deplaned without further incident. An inspection of the #1 engine at the ramp did not reveal any thermal damage to the exterior; however, cowling removal revealed physical evidence of thermal damage in the aft section of the engine in the area of the lower turbine support case. Two flexible fuel drain lines were found fire damaged and replaced. The 14 fuel nozzle assemblies, and the associated 144 "O" rings (Part number ST3367-009) were replaced. One "O" ring on the #3 fuel nozzle was found separated, and two "O" rings on the #12 nozzle were deteriorated. The system was leak tested following reinstallation and no fuel leaks were noted. Testing at the engine manufacturer facility revealed that the inside diameter of the copper gasket used at the fuel drain nipple (Part Number 3023431) was found to be 30 to 40 percent larger than required. This oversize resulted in misalignment when the fitting is tightened, resulting in leaks. The engine manufacturer issued service bulletin P&WC S.B. No. 21416 to replace the oversize gasket with one with a smaller inner diameter made of corrugated stainless steel (Part Number 3122594-01). The operator issued a Fleet Campaign Directive (FCD) to modify the affected airplanes. The engine manufacturer is currently developing a redesigned fuel nozzle/manifold system for all the PW100 series of engines. A copy of their proposed system is enclosed. According to the operator's maintenance records, the fuel nozzles were last replaced on July 3, 1995, at 6,855 hours. The upper flex line at the overboard drain mast had been previously inspected (boroscope) for blockage/clogging on September 27, 1995, at 7,343 hours, as per the operator's FCD # E2-71-001R2. A review of the operator's maintenance practices, as well as the installation and inspection procedures involving the fuel distribution system for the PW127 engines were reviewed Federal Aviation Administration inspectors. No anomalies or deviations were found. During normal cruise, the left engine experienced a 20% loss of torque. The crew was informed by company maintenance personnel that they might be experiencing a possible fuel nozzle leak on that engine. The #1 engine fire warning light illuminated, and the fire horn activated. The captain secured the engine and discharged the #1 fire suppression agent. Immediately following the discharge, the associated warning lights on the fire handle and condition lever extinguished. An uneventful single engine landing was completed and the passengers deplaned without further incident. Evidence of thermal damage was found in the aft section of the engine in the area of the lower turbine support case. Examination of the system revealed that 3 of the 144 'O' rings associated with the 14-nozzle fuel system were deteriorated or damaged. Also, during the investigation, testing at the engine manufacturer's facility revealed that the inside diameter of the copper gasket used at the fuel drain nipple was 30 to 40% larger than required. This resulted in misalignment and a leak at the fitting. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1995_FTW96IA024.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.