Skip to content

Type Record · As of May 3, 2026

BURKHART GROB G103C TWIN III ACRO

Glider · NONE NONE

Registered

7

Year Range

1989–1992

NTSB Events

2

Airworthiness Directives

0

01 /  Distribution

Where the fleet lives and was built

Counts of currently-registered BURKHART GROB G103C TWIN III ACRO aircraft by US state and decade of manufacture, sourced from the FAA Aircraft Registry.

By State (top 10)

  • WA 28.6% 2
  • TX 14.3% 1
  • NV 14.3% 1
  • CA 14.3% 1
  • PA 14.3% 1
  • HI 14.3% 1

By Decade of Manufacture

  • 1980s 42.9% 3
  • 1990s 28.6% 2
  • Unknown 28.6% 2

02 /  NTSB Records

Events involving BURKHART GROB G103C TWIN III ACRO aircraft

2 event(s) on file. Showing the most recent 2.

03 /  Airworthiness Directives

FAA directives applicable to BURKHART GROB G103C TWIN III ACRO

No matching airworthiness directives are on file for this make and model in the Federal Register.

04 /  Type Certificate Data Sheets

FAA TCDS for BURKHART GROB G103C TWIN III ACRO

The TCDS is the legal certification document — weight limits, performance, equipment, AD compliance times, operating limitations. 1 match in the FAA catalog.

  • G39EU Historical Rev 7 · 08/23/2005

    Burkhart Grob Luft-Und

    Models: G103C Twin III Acro, G103 Twin Astir, G103 Twin II, G103A Twin II Acro

05 /  Aircraft of this type

All 7 registered N-numbers

Every tail currently on the FAA registry for this make/model. Click an N-number to query the FAA Aircraft Inquiry; rows flagged have NTSB events on file. Tails seeded with full TallyAero pages link directly.

7 of 7
N-number St Year NTSB FAA
N103BP WA 1992 · Look up ↗
N103GH TX 1989 Look up ↗
N103LM WA 1989 · Look up ↗
N2102Z NV · Look up ↗
N41KP CA 1992 Look up ↗
N487GC PA 1989 · Look up ↗
N787SF HI · Look up ↗

Source — FAA Aircraft Registry · click "Look up" to query the live registry record (owner, address, last airworthiness)

05 /  Sources & Methodology

Every count traces back to a primary US-government source

We render counts and lists as the agency publishes them. Read the methodology →