Judging Airline Pilots’ Performance With and Without an Assessment Model: A Comparison Study of the Scoring of Raters From Two Different Airlines

Published 2016-01-01 From Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University 1 author

View on Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons ↗

Attribution

This is the abstract and citation. Full text lives at Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons — we link out rather than host. All credit to the authors and Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.

Abstract

Verbatim from Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons. Not paraphrased, not summarized.

Various models have been suggested to assess the performance of airline pilots. However, the influence of a model on assessors’ scoring remains largely unexplored. The aim of the present study was to contrast the assessments of raters from two airlines, who assessed performance in pairs of the same airline and rank by using or not using an assessment model. The results showed differences between the assessors of the two airlines in terms of their scoring. Implications were drawn in regards to the usage of a model and its influence on pilot performance assessment.

Author

Weber, David Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Keywords

assessment
scoring
airline pilot performance
Aviation
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research
Management and Operations

Citation: Weber, David (2016). Judging Airline Pilots’ Performance With and Without an Assessment Model: A Comparison Study of the Scoring of Raters From Two Different Airlines. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons ID oai:commons.erau.edu:jaaer-1645. https://commons.erau.edu/jaaer/vol25/iss2/2 ↗