Skip to content

Atlas / Learn / Papers / 20180001222

NASA NTRS · Conference Paper

Linking the Pilot Structural Model and Pilot Workload

Published 2019-07-12 From Ames Research Center 4 authors

Attribution

This is the abstract and citation. Full text lives at NASA NTRS — we link out rather than host. All credit to the authors and Ames Research Center.

Abstract

Verbatim from NASA NTRS. Not paraphrased, not summarized.

Behavioral models are developed that closely reproduced pulsive control response of two pilots using markedly different control techniques while conducting a tracking task. An intriguing find was that the pilots appeared to: 1) produce a continuous, internally-generated stick signal that they integrated in time; 2) integrate the actual stick position; and 3) compare the two integrations to either issue or cease a pulse command. This suggests that the pilots utilized kinesthetic feedback in order to sense and integrate stick position, supporting the hypothesis that pilots can access and employ the proprioceptive inner feedback loop proposed by Hess's pilot Structural Model. A Pilot Cost Index was developed, whose elements include estimated workload, performance, and the degree to which the pilot employs kinesthetic feedback. Preliminary results suggest that a pilot's operating point (parameter values) may be based on control style and index minimization.

Authors

  • Bachelder, Edward San Jose State Univ.
  • Hess, Ronald California Univ.
  • Aponso, Bimal NASA Ames Research Center
  • Godfroy-Cooper, Martine San Jose State Univ.

Keywords

  • Pilot workload
  • Pilot Modeling
  • Neuromuscular dynamic

Citation: Bachelder, Edward, Hess, Ronald, Aponso, Bimal , et al. (2019). Linking the Pilot Structural Model and Pilot Workload. Ames Research Center. NASA NTRS ID 20180001222. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20180001222 ↗