NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ANC96LA093
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot of the Cessna 180, N5020E, disregard of an air traffic control clearance/instruction to hold short. A factor in the accident was the failure of both pilots to maintain an adequate visual lookout for other aircraft.
Factual narrative
On June 29, 1996, at 1206 Alaska daylight time, an amphibious float equipped Cessna 206, N5244Z, collided with a fixed float equipped Cessna 180, N5020E, over Lake Hood Seaplane base, in Anchorage, Alaska. Both airplanes were being operated as visual flight rules (VFR) cross-country personal flights when the accident occurred. Both airplanes, registered to and operated by their respective pilots, sustained substantial damage. The certificated private pilot of N5244Z and 3 passengers, and the certificated airline transport pilot, the sole occupant of N5020E, were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed. Both airplanes were departing Lake Hood Seaplane Base when the accident occurred. The Lake Hood Seaplane Base consists of Lake Hood on the west and Lake Spenard on the east and are connected by a canal. The canal is oriented south of Gull Island that lies between the two lakes. The canal is the east/west runway/water lane of the seaplane base. Lake Hood contains a north/south water lane and a southeast/northwest lane. Lake Spenard contains the departure end of the west water lane. Numerous uncontrolled areas and seaplane docking facilities are contained within both lakes. Review of the air-ground radio communications tapes maintained by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Anchorage, Alaska, Lake Hood (LHD) Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) facility, revealed that both pilots were in radio contact with the tower. At 1203:23, the pilot of N5244Z reported to the local controller that he was entering Lake Hood at the public ramp and was water taxiing for a southeast departure on the lake. At 1204:43, the pilot of N5020E contacted the local controller and reported that he was at the east shore of Lake Spenard and requested a west departure. The controller confirmed that the pilot was requesting a west departure and advised the pilot to "...hold short of the west, advise ready." At 1205:02, the pilot of N5020E acknowledged the radio transmission. At 1205:52, the pilot of N5244Z was cleared for takeoff toward the southeast from Lake Hood. At 1206:07, the pilot of N5020E again advised the local controller that he was ready for a west departure. He was again advised to hold short; however, the pilot did not acknowledge the radio transmission. The local controller observed N5020E airborne about mid-canal in a westbound direction and N5244Z airborne in an eastbound direction. Both airplanes collided about 100 feet above the canal.. The pilot of N5244Z initially reported what he thought was a bird strike and returned for landing on Lake Hood. He then filed a mid-air collision report. Damage to the right horizontal stabilizer and elevator was verified by an FAA airworthiness inspector and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator-in-charge (IIC). The pilot of N5020E continued his departure. On June 30, 1996, the pilot of N5020E returned to his dock at Lake Spenard. Damage to the right wingtip and right aileron was verified by the FAA and NTSB. The pilot of the Cessna 206, N5244Z, had reported to the local controller that he was entering Lake Hood at the public ramp and was water taxiing foe a southeast departure on the lake. Approximately one minute later the pilot of the Cessna 180, N5020E, reported to the local controller that he was at the east shore of Lake Spenard requesting a west departure. The pilot of the C-180 was advised to 'hold short of the west, advise ready.' The pilot of the C-206 was cleared for takeoff, and the pilot of the C-180 was again advised to hold short; however the C-180 pilot did not acknowledge the radio transmission. The C-206 departed and began a climb over the canal separating the two lakes that comprise the seaplane base. The C-180 departed in a westbound direction. The airplanes collided about 100 feet above the canal. The right horizontal stabilizer and elevator of the C-206 was struck by the right wing of the C-180. The C-206 returned and landed safely. The pilot of the C-180 continued his departure and returned to the seaplane base the next day. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1996_ANC96LA093.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (mid-air collision). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Invisible Aircraft in U.S. Airspace: Regulatory Gaps and Mid-Air Collision Risk for Part 121 Operators
Scheduled air carrier aircraft operate at large and small commercial airports across the U.S. National Airspace System. These turbine-powered aircraft fly at high speeds during departure and approach,…
- Semantic Scholar 2023 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety)
Bayesian network model of aviation safety: Impact of new communication technologies on mid-air collisions
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2022 · Faculty research project
Small UAS (sUAS) Mid-Air Collision (MAC) Likelihood
This research focuses on sUAS MAC likelihood analysis with general aviation (GA) and commercial aircraft. Because severity research varies based on where a collision occurred on a manned aircraft, thi…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Analyzing a Mid-Air Collision Over the Hudson River
On August 8, 2009, a private airplane collided with a sightseeing helicopter over the Hudson River near Hoboken, New Jersey.
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Intent-Aware MPC for Aircraft Detect-and-Avoid with Response Delay: A Comparative Study with ACAS Xu
In this paper, we propose an intent-aware Model Predictive Control (MPC) approach for the remain-well-clear (RWC) functionality of a multi-agent aircraft detect-and-avoid (DAA) system and compare its …
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint
Multi-Aircraft Scheduling Optimization in Urban Environments
With the increasing development of intelligent transportation systems and advancements in aviation technology, the concept of Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) is gaining attention.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗