NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ATL01LA041
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The Powerback Coordinator's failure to follow powerback procedures which resulted in jet blast injuries to the wing walker. A factor was the stuck wheel chock.
Factual narrative
About 2100 central standard time, on March 23, 2001, a Boeing 727-200, N275US, operated by Northwest Airlines, as Flight 934, blew over a ramp employee during a power back from the terminal gate at Memphis Tennessee International Airport in Memphis, Tennessee. Flight 934 was operated under the provisions of Title 14 CFR Part 121, as a scheduled, domestic passenger flight from Memphis, Tennessee, to Miami. The flight was scheduled to depart the Memphis Tennessee International Airport at approximately 2100. There were three crewmembers and 124 revenue passengers on board Flight 934. No injuries were reported by the flight crew or the passengers. The wing walker received serious injuries. Visual metrological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The flight was operated on an instrument flight plan. According to the Northwest Airlines Safety Official, a wing walker was removing a stuck wheel chock from the right main landing gear during a power-back from the gate. The wing walker was blown over by the jet blast after the chock was removed. The wing walker received serious injuries. The flight was cancelled, and the passengers were deplaned. According to the flight crew, they were given the signal for engine start. After completing the taxi check, the flight crew signaled they were ready for powerback. The flight crew then stated, the coordinator signal for them to come forward. The captain moved the airplane forward by applying forward thrust. The Powerback/Coordinator then gave the flight crew the signal to stop. After a slight delay, the Powerback Coordinator then gave the powerback signal. The captain moved the throttles into reverse thrust, moving back for a very short distance. The Powerback Coordinator then gave the crew the stop signal. According to the Powerback Coordinator, there was a stuck wheel chock under the right main inner landing gear on the aft side. He gave the signal for the airplane to move forward so that the wing walker could remove the chock. After the airplane moved forward, he then gave the signal to stop. The wing walker unchocked the airplane, and proceeded to position himself for powerback. The wing walker was then blown to the ground behind the left main gear. The Powerback Coordinator stated that due to darkness he could not see the wing walker behind the gear. The Powerback Coordinator stated that the airplane started to move backwards, and he gave the crew the emergency stop signal. According to the wing walker, the airplane had settled back on the right main landing gear chock. He advised the marshaller that he would remove the chock when the airplane was moved forward. As the airplane was moved forward, the wing walker removed the chock and disposed of it to the right. He walked back under the airplane to the left wing. As he was exiting the left side, he heard the thrust reversers deploy and was knocked down by the reverse thrust. The wing walker stated that he was in no position to see the Powerback Coordinators signals. The Northwest Airlines Standard Practice Manual states, Powerback Coordinator (Marshal)-(Provides signals to the Captain) "Item A.1a. The Marshal is responsible for ensuring Wing Walkers are in proper position before giving the all clear signal. Never signal the flight deck crew to move the aircraft until the Wing Walker is in position and ready". According to the Airlines Safety Official, a wing walker was removing a stuck wheel chock from the right main landing gear during a power-back from the gate. The wing walker was blown over by the jet blast after the chock was removed. The wing walker received serious injuries. The Airline's Standard Practice Manual states, the Marshal is responsible for ensuring wing walkers are in proper position before giving the all clear signal. The flight was cancelled, and the passengers were deplaned. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2001_ATL01LA041.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type. Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 1993 · Journal article (JAAER)
A Cost Analysis: Re-Engining a Boeing 727-200 (Advanced) Versus Buying a New Boeing 757-200
The Boeing 727-200 and 757-200 are both narrowbody aircraft designed for short- to medium-range flights carrying 164 to 214 passengers.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Flight simulator platform motion and air transport pilot training
The effect of a flight simulator platform motion on the performance and training of a pilot was evaluated using subjective ratings and objective performance data obtained on experienced B-727 pilots a…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Description and flight performance of two systems for two-segment approach
This paper describes two different avionic systems which were designed and developed to provide guidance and control for two-segment noise abatement approaches.
- NASA NTRS 2011 · Reprint (Version printed in journal)
Flight Simulator Platform Motion and Air Transport Pilot Training
The influence of flight simulator platform motion on pilot training and performance was examined In two studies utilizing a B-727-200 aircraft simulator.
- NASA NTRS 2011 · Reprint (Version printed in journal)
Predicted airframe noise levels for certification flights
A correction is presented for a previously published inconsistency in predicted airframe noise values, which were based on approach velocities lower than those required for FAA certification.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗