ATL05CA085
2005-05-21 · Augusta, Georgia, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot-in-command's improper use of the flight controls during climb which resulted in the flight attendant injury. A factor was the flight crew failure to follow written procedures during transfer of flight controls.
Factual narrative
On May 21, 2005, at 2040 eastern daylight time, a Canadair CL600, N699CW, registered to Ramona Aviation LLC, operated by Flight Options LLC, as a 14 CFR Part 91 positioning flight, made an abrupt pitch-up attitude and injured the flight attendant during climb out from Chattanooga, Tennessee, while enroute to Augusta, Georgia. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and an instrument rules flight plan was filed. The airplane was not damaged. The pilot-in command (PIC) and co-pilot reported no injuries. The flight attendant received serious injuries. The flight departed Lovell Field, Chattanooga, Tennessee, on May 21, 2005, at 2026. During the climb to the assigned altitude, the pilot was instructed by the air traffic controller to expedite its climb through flight level 250 within two minutes and to maintain flight level 290. The co-pilot was flying the airplane and rotated the speed bug to 300 knots. The PIC verbally instructed the co-pilot to, "get this thing climbing." At the same time the PIC pulled back on the control column which disconnected the autopilot and the nose of the airplane pitched up. The flight attendant was subsequently heard calling for help from the back of the airplane. The PIC departed the flight deck and found the flight attendant injured on the floor in the aft part of the cabin. The flight continued to and landed at August, Georgia, with out further incident. Review of Flight Option Standard Operating Procedures, Section 2-4, Manipulation of Flight Controls b. Transfer of Control states, If it is necessary to transfer control from one pilot to the other a positive, verbal command will be given. The pilot flying will state "You have the flight controls." The pilot taking the flight controls will state, "I have the controls." The co-pilot was flying the airplane climbing to an assigned altitude. Air Traffic Control instructed the flight to expedite their climb through flight level 250.The co-pilot rotated the speed bug to 300 knots. The pilot-in-command (PIC) verbally instructed the co-pilot to, "get this thing climbing." At the same time the PIC pulled back on the control column and disconnected the autopilot and the nose of the airplane pitched up. The PIC did not establish a positive transfer of the flight controls as required by company standard operating procedures. The flight attendant was subsequently heard calling for help from the back of the airplane. The PIC departed the flight deck and found the flight attendant on the floor in the aft part of the cabin with serious injuries. The flight continued to the destination airport and landed without further incident. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2005_ATL05CA085.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (autopilot). All research papers
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint ROSflight 2.0: Lean ROS 2-Based Autopilot for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
ROSflight is a lean, open-source autopilot ecosystem for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Designed by researchers for researchers, it is built to lower the barrier to entry to UAV research and acceler…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint ROSplane 2.0: A Fixed-Wing Autopilot for Research
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) research requires the integration of cutting-edge technology into existing autopilot frameworks.
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint A Data-Driven Autopilot for Fixed-Wing Aircraft Based on Model Predictive Control
Autopilots for fixed-wing aircraft are typically designed based on linearized aerodynamic models consisting of stability and control derivatives obtained from wind-tunnel testing.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Experimental Flight Testing of a Fault-Tolerant Adaptive Autopilot for Fixed-Wing Aircraft
This paper presents an adaptive autopilot for fixed-wing aircraft and compares its performance with a fixed-gain autopilot.
- arXiv 2021 · arXiv preprint An Adaptive Digital Autopilot for Fixed-Wing Aircraft with Actuator Faults
This paper develops an adaptive digital autopilot for a fixed-wing aircraft and compares its performance with a fixed-gain autopilot.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Robust Adaptive Sliding-Mode Control for Damaged Fixed-Wing UAVs
Many unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can remain aerodynamically flyable after sustaining structural or control surface damage, yet insufficient robustness in conventional autopilots often leads to mis…