CEN10LA315
2010-06-12 · Denver, Colorado, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport DEN
Current FAA registration · N195GL
- Make / Model
- BEECH 1900D
- Year of manufacture
- 1996 · 14 years old at event
- Engine
- P&W PT6A SER (750 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 19 seats · 2 engines
- Last airworthiness date
- 19960130
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A17B5F
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pre-existent damage of the right-hand landing gear actuator attachment lug which led to fatigue cracking and eventual overload failure resulting in a collapsed gear upon landing.
Factual narrative
On June 12, 2010, approximately 1625 mountain daylight time, a Beech 1900D, N195GL, registered to and operated by Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd., Cheyenne, Wyoming, was substantially damaged when the left main landing gear collapsed on landing at Denver International Airport (DEN), Denver, Colorado. Visual meteorological conditions (VMC) prevailed at the time of the accident. The positioning flight was being conducted under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91, and an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan had been filed. The airline transport certificated captain and commercial certificated first officer, the only occupants aboard, were not injured. The cross-country flight had just originated, and was destined for Cheyenne, Wyoming. When the crew retracted the landing gear after takeoff, they heard a loud "bang." The crew circled the airport. When they lowered the landing gear, all three landing gear annunciator lights indicated SAFE, but the IN TRANSIT annunciator light also illuminated. After consulting with their maintenance department, the crew landed on runway 35R. During rollout, the left main gear collapsed. Post-accident examination revealed the drag leg assembly was fractured. When the gear collapsed, a portion of the wing spar bent. On July 22, 2010, acting on behalf of the National Transportation Safety Board, representatives of the Federal Aviation Administration examined the drag leg assembly at Hawker Beechcraft’s Metallurgical Engineering Laboratory in Wichita, Kansas. Also in attendance were representatives from Great Lakes Aviation. The examination revealed that both lugs that attach to the landing gear actuator were fractured, as was the rig plate. The drag leg was bent. The right hand lug contained a fatigue crack that progressed to an overload failure. The other lug fractured completely through overload. Beach marks associated with the fatigue crack were clearly visible. The fracture surface was damaged by mating crack face abrasion. Striations and mechanical damage was also noted. The damage was pre-existent to the cracking, and served as a stress concentrator leading to the initiation of a fatigue crack. The upper drag leg arm is made of aluminum alloy 7075 in the T6 temper. Spectrographic analysis showed that the material met the chemical composition requirements of that specification. Aerospace Material Specification (AMS) 2658 requires this material in the T6 temper to have a minimum Rockwell hardness of B scale 84 and a conductivity between 30.5 % IACS (International Annealed Copper Standard) and 36 % IACS. The drag leg had a Rockwell hardness of B87.7 and displayed an electrical conductivity of 32% IACS. When the crew retracted the landing gear after takeoff, they heard a loud "bang." When they lowered the gear, all three landing gear annunciator lights indicated SAFE, but the left gear light also indicated IN TRANSIT. After consulting with their maintenance department, the crew landed and, during rollout, the left main gear collapsed. Postaccident examination revealed the drag leg assembly was fractured. When the gear collapsed, a portion of the wing spar was torn out. Metallurgical examination revealed that both lugs that attach to the landing gear actuator and the rig plate were fractured and the drag leg was bent. The right-hand lug contained a fatigue crack that progressed to an overload failure. The other lug fractured completely through overload. The damage was pre-existent to that cracking, and served as a stress concentrator leading to the initiation of a fatigue crack. Spectrographic analysis of the upper drag leg arm showed that it met specified chemical composition requirements. At time of accident the aircraft had operated about 82.9 hours and 95 cycles since a detailed inspection of the landing gear was accomplished on May 28, 2010; no discrepancies related to the lug were noted at that time. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Landing gear actuator-Fatigue/wear/corrosion - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_CEN10LA315.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…