CEN10LA567
2010-09-18 · Denton, Texas, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport DTO
Current FAA registration · N56VP
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 320
- Year of manufacture
- 1961 · 49 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR TSI0-470-B (260 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 5 seats · 2 engines
- Last airworthiness date
- 19611010
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A7267A
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The failure of the landing gear push-pull rod.
Factual narrative
On September 18, 2010, approximately 1145 central daylight time, a Cessna 320, N56VP, registered to and operated by the Association of Orthopedic Services PA, Grand Prairie, Texas, was substantially damaged when the nose gear folded on landing at Denton Municipal Airport (DTO), Denton, Texas. Visual meteorological conditions (VMC) prevailed at the time of the accident. The instructional flight was being conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 without a flight plan. The instructor and pilot on board the airplane were not injured. The local flight originated at Grand Prairie Municipal Airport (GPM) approximately 0930. According to the flight instructor's accident report, the purpose of the flight was to administer a flight review and insurance endorsement to the pilot. After making 4 touch-and-go landings at Decatur (LUD), Texas, Municipal Airport, the flight proceeded to Decatur's Bishop Field (76T) to make a soft field landing on the grass runway. When the landing gear was extended, the GEAR DOWN AND LOCKED light did not illuminate. The annunciator lights were checked (press-to-test) and operated normally. Checking the convex mirrors on the engine nacelles confirmed the nose gear was only partially extended. The landing gear was cycled several times and manually extended at least 3 times. "G snaps" were made but to no avail. The instructor landed the airplane on DTO's runway 17 and the nose gear folded. Post-accident inspection revealed the push-pull rod that goes through the main spar and connects the gear transmission to the nose gear had separated, damaging the spar and several fuselage ribs. The Cessna 320 Maintenance Manual requires that the main and nose gear drive tubes and idler mechanism, in addition to rigging and clearance, be checked every 100 hours or 12 months, whichever comes first. During an instructional flight the student pilot performed four uneventful touch-and-go practice takeoffs and landings at one airport and then proceeded to another airport to make a soft-field landing on the grass runway. When the landing gear was extended, the landing gear indicator light did not illuminate. The annunciator lights were checked (press-to-test) and operated normally. He confirmed that the nose landing gear was only partially extended by looking in the convex mirrors mounted in on the engine nacelles. After the pilots cycled the landing gear several times and attempted to perform a manual extension least three times, the certificated flight instructor landed the airplane and the nose gear folded. A postaccident inspection revealed that the push-pull rod that connects the gear transmission to the nose gear had separated, damaging the wing spar and several fuselage ribs. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Gear extension and retract sys-Failure - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_CEN10LA567.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Experimental investigations on the characteristics of snow accretion using the EMU-320 model train
This paper presents a snow accretion test conducted in a climate wind tunnel to investigate the icing process on a model train.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2017 · Conference paper Pilot Control Design Influences on Pilot Monitoring Effectiveness of Crew Resource Management in Airbus 320 Landings
The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of Airbus flight control design on pilot perception of Crew Resource Management (CRM) in the landing phase of flight.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2015 · Journal article (JAAER) Is “Green Dot” Always the Optimum Engines-Out Glide Speed on the Airbus A320 Aircraft?
The dual-engine failure checklist of the Airbus A320 states that the optimum airspeed at which the aircraft can be flown is the “green dot” speed when an engine restart is considered impossible.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.