CEN12LA557
2012-08-14 · Flandreau, South Dakota, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 4P3
Current FAA registration · N444EH
- Make / Model
- BELL 47G-2
- Year of manufacture
- 1959 · 53 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING VO-435 SERIES (260 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 3 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19910520
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A559E5
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A malfunction of the helicopter’s throttle system, which resulted in a loss of engine power during cruise flight.
Factual narrative
On August 14, 2012, about 0910 central daylight time, a Bell model 47G-2 helicopter, N444EH, was substantially damaged during an autorotation following a loss of engine power near Flandreau, South Dakota. The pilot and passenger were not injured. The aircraft was registered to and operated by private individuals under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight, which was not operated on a flight plan. The flight originated from Flandreau Municipal Airport (4P3) about 0815. The intended destination was the pilot's farm located near Colman, South Dakota. The pilot reported that after conducting three approaches to the runway at 4P3, he departed for his farm. He stated that during cruise flight, about 4 miles from the farm, the helicopter lost engine power. He initiated an autorotation; however, the only available landing area was a pasture that resulted in a tailwind approach and landing. The landing from the autorotation was reportedly a “little rough,” causing the helicopter to bounce and roll onto its left side. The tail boom, main rotor blades, tail rotor blades, and fuselage were damaged during the autorotation landing. A postaccident examination conducted by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector revealed that the throttle system did not operate properly. At the time of the examination, the hand grip on the collective throttle control was loose. Movement of the hand grip did not fully translate into movement of the throttle linkage. The throttle cable was subsequently disconnected at both ends and further examination revealed that the cable was not free to move within the conduit. The conduit did not appear to be deformed or damaged in a manner that would have prevented movement of the cable. A review of maintenance records revealed that the most recent annual inspection was completed on March 12, 2012, at a total airframe time of 15,659.1 hours. At the time of that inspection, the engine had accumulated 549.0 hours since overhaul. The records included an entry dated May 8, 2012, which stated, “New throttle conduit and cable installed. Needs Test.” The mechanic that performed the maintenance on the throttle system stated that he had replaced the conduit but had used the same cable assembly. He noted that the conduit was in new packaging from the manufacturer, but that there was no serviceable tag for the component. Regarding the “Needs Test” notation in the log book, the mechanic stated that the owner had hover taxied the helicopter onto a trailer prior to it being transported from Kansas to South Dakota. The pilot informed the mechanic that the throttle system performed normally at that time. The pilot reported that the helicopter lost engine power during cruise flight. He initiated an autorotation; however, the only available landing area was a pasture that resulted in a tailwind approach and landing. The landing from the autorotation was reportedly a “little rough,” and the helicopter bounced and rolled onto its left side. A postaccident examination revealed that the throttle system did not operate properly. Specifically, the hand grip on the collective throttle control was loose and the throttle cable was not free to move within the conduit. The conduit did not appear to be deformed or damaged in a manner that would have prevented movement of the cable. The throttle conduit was replaced about 3 months before the accident; however, the existing throttle cable was reinstalled with the new conduit. A brief operational test of the throttle system was successfully conducted after that maintenance and the helicopter was subsequently operated for more than 25 hours without incident before the accident occurred. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine controls-(general)-Malfunction - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2012_CEN12LA557.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.